Tuesday, May 29, 2012 by Common Dreams
Fukushima Radiation Found in Tuna Off California
Monday, May 28, 2012 by Common Dreams
Growing Fear Over Fukushima Fuel Pool 4 as Wall Bulge Detected
TEPCO admits a bulge detected in the walls of Unit 4, stoking fears over the building’s stability
Monday, May 28, 2012 by Common Dreams
Japan's Toxic Tsunami Debris Heads Towards North America
Chris Pallister of the Gulf of Alaska Keeper Organization: "This is more hazardous than oil"
Fukushima Radiation Found in Tuna Off California
Detectable amounts of cesium-137 and
cesium-134 were found in bluefin tuna caught off the coast of California
about four months after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, US
scientists reported on Monday.
The timing is important because it shows that migrating fish carried radiation much further and faster than either wind or ocean currents. In addition, of course, the bluefin are a highly prized edible fish found in sushi restaurants all over the world.
Without making a definitive judgment on the safety of the fish, lead author Daniel Madigan of Stanford University's Hopkins Marine Station told Reuters that the amount of radioactive material detected was far less than the Japanese safety limit.
"I wouldn't tell anyone what's safe to eat or what's not safe to eat," she said. "It's become clear that some people feel that any amount of radioactivity, in their minds, is bad and they'd like to avoid it."
The timing is important because it shows that migrating fish carried radiation much further and faster than either wind or ocean currents. In addition, of course, the bluefin are a highly prized edible fish found in sushi restaurants all over the world.
Without making a definitive judgment on the safety of the fish, lead author Daniel Madigan of Stanford University's Hopkins Marine Station told Reuters that the amount of radioactive material detected was far less than the Japanese safety limit.
"I wouldn't tell anyone what's safe to eat or what's not safe to eat," she said. "It's become clear that some people feel that any amount of radioactivity, in their minds, is bad and they'd like to avoid it."
* * *
Reuters reports:There was about five times the background amount of cesium 137 in the bluefin tuna they tested, but that is still a tiny quantity, Madigan said: 5 becquerels instead of 1 becquerel. (It takes 37 billion becquerels to equal 1 curie; for context, a pound of uranium-238 has 0.00015 curies of radioactivity, so one becquerel would be a truly miniscule proportion.)
The researchers figured that the elevated levels of cesium 137 and all of the cesium 134 they detected came from Fukushima because of the way bluefin tuna migrate across the Pacific.
Bluefin tuna spawn only in the western Pacific, off the coasts of Japan and the Philippines. As young fish, some migrate east to the California coast, where upwelling ocean water brings lots of food for them and their prey. They get to these waters as juveniles or adolescents, and remain there, fattening up.
Judging by the size of the bluefin tuna they sampled - they averaged about 15 pounds (6 kg) - the researchers knew these were young fish that had left Japanese water about a month after the accident.
Most of the radiation was released over a few days in April 2011, and unlike some other compounds, radioactive cesium does not quickly sink to the sea bottom but remains dispersed in the water column, from the surface to the ocean floor.
Fish can swim right through it, ingesting it through their gills, by taking in seawater or by eating organisms that have already taken it in, Madigan said.
* * *
The Guardian adds:The results "are unequivocal. Fukushima was the source", said Ken Buesseler of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, who played no part in the research.
Japan's chief cabinet secretary, Osamu Fujimura, conceded that the findings suggested the monitoring of radiation levels in fish outside Japanese waters may have to be stepped up. [...]
"We were frankly kind of startled," said Nicholas Fisher, an expert at Stony Brook University in New York who took part in the study. "That's a big ocean. To swim across it and still retain these radionuclides is pretty amazing."
The operator of the Fukushima Daiichi plant, Tokyo Electric Power, estimates that 18,000 terabecquerels of radioactive materials flowed into the Pacific after the accident, either in the form of fallout, or through mixing with water that leaked from the facility. A terabecquerel is equal to 1tn becquerels.
* * *
Monday, May 28, 2012 by Common Dreams
Growing Fear Over Fukushima Fuel Pool 4 as Wall Bulge Detected
TEPCO admits a bulge detected in the walls of Unit 4, stoking fears over the building’s stability
A new bulge in the walls of the Fukushima Unit 4 nuclear plant has driven growing new fears over in Japan.
Attention has focused on Unit 4’s spent fuel pool because of the large number of assemblies filled with rods that are stored high above the ground at that severly damaged reactor building. Three other reactor buildings at the site are also badly damaged, but their pools hold fewer used assemblies.
On Saturday Japan’s government sent Environment and Nuclear Minister Goshi Hosonoto to inspect Unit 4.
Mr Hosono said the government accepted the Tokyo Electric Power Company's assurances that reinforcement work had shored up the building.
But many Japanese have scoffed at such assurances and point out that the pool's cooling system has malfunctioned several times.
''The No. 4 reactor is visibly damaged and in a fragile state, down to the floor that holds the spent fuel pool,'' said Hiroaki Koide, an assistant professor at Kyoto University's Research Reactor Institute. ''Any radioactive release could be huge and go directly into the environment.''
Attention has focused on Unit 4’s spent fuel pool because of the large number of assemblies filled with rods that are stored high above the ground at that severly damaged reactor building. Three other reactor buildings at the site are also badly damaged, but their pools hold fewer used assemblies.
On Saturday Japan’s government sent Environment and Nuclear Minister Goshi Hosonoto to inspect Unit 4.
Mr Hosono said the government accepted the Tokyo Electric Power Company's assurances that reinforcement work had shored up the building.
But many Japanese have scoffed at such assurances and point out that the pool's cooling system has malfunctioned several times.
''The No. 4 reactor is visibly damaged and in a fragile state, down to the floor that holds the spent fuel pool,'' said Hiroaki Koide, an assistant professor at Kyoto University's Research Reactor Institute. ''Any radioactive release could be huge and go directly into the environment.''
* * *
The New York Times reports:
What passes for normal at the Fukushima Daiichi
plant today would have caused shudders among even the most sanguine of
experts before an earthquake and tsunami set off the world’s second most
serious nuclear crisis after Chernobyl.
Fourteen months after the accident, a pool
brimming with used fuel rods and filled with vast quantities of
radioactive cesium still sits on the top floor of a heavily damaged
reactor building, covered only with plastic.
The public’s fears about the pool have grown in
recent months as some scientists have warned that it has the most
potential for setting off a new catastrophe, now that the three nuclear
reactors that suffered meltdowns are in a more stable state, and as
frequent quakes continue to rattle the region.
Senator Wyden, whose state
could lie in the path of any new radioactive plumes, is among those
pushing for faster action. After his recent visit to the ravaged plant,
he said the pool at No. 4 poses “an extraordinary and continuing risk”
and the retrieval of spent fuel “should be a priority, given the
possibility of further earthquakes.”The worries picked up new
traction in recent days after the operator of the plant, Tokyo Electric
Power Company, or Tepco, said it had found a slight bulge in one of the
walls of the reactor building, stoking fears over the building’s safety.
To try to quell such worries, the government sent
the environment and nuclear minister to the plant on Saturday, where he
climbed a makeshift staircase in protective garb to look at the
structure supporting the pool, which he said appeared sound. The
minister, Goshi Hosono, added that although the government accepted
Tepco’s assurances that reinforcement work had shored up the building,
it ordered the company to conduct further studies because of the bulge.
[...]
“The No. 4 reactor is visibly damaged and in a
fragile state, down to the floor that holds the spent fuel pool,” said
Hiroaki Koide, an assistant professor at Kyoto University’s Research
Reactor Institute and one of the experts raising concerns. “Any
radioactive release could be huge and go directly into the environment.”
Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, expressed similar concerns during a trip to Japan last month.
The fears over the pool at Reactor No. 4 are
helping to undermine assurances by Tepco and the Japanese government
that the Fukushima plant has been stabilized, and are highlighting how
complicated the cleanup of the site, expected to take decades, will be.
The concerns are also raising questions about whether Japan’s all-out
effort to convince its citizens that nuclear power is safe kept the
authorities from exploring other — and some say safer — options for
storing used fuel rods.
“It was taboo to raise questions about the spent
fuel that was piling up,” said Hideo Kimura, who worked as a nuclear
fuel engineer at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in the 1990s. “But it was
clear that there was nowhere for the spent fuel to go.”
The worst-case situations for Reactor No. 4 would
be for the pool to run dry if there is another problem with the cooling
system and the rods catch fire, releasing enormous amounts of
radioactive material, or for fission to restart if the metal panels that
separate the rods are knocked over in a quake. That would be especially
bad because the pool, unlike reactors, lacks containment vessels to
hold in radioactive materials. (Even the roof that used to exist would
be no match if the rods caught fire, for instance.)
Senator Wyden, whose state could lie in the path
of any new radioactive plumes and who has studied nuclear waste issues,
is among those pushing for faster action. After his recent visit to the
ravaged plant, he said the pool at No. 4 poses “an extraordinary and
continuing risk” and the retrieval of spent fuel “should be a priority,
given the possibility of further earthquakes.”
Attention has focused on No. 4’s spent fuel pool
because of the large number of assemblies filled with rods that are
stored at that reactor building. Three other reactor buildings at the
site are also badly damaged, but their pools hold fewer used assemblies.
According to Tepco, the pool at the No. 4 reactor,
which was not operating at the time of the accident, holds 1,331 spent
fuel assemblies, which each contain dozens of rods. Several thousand
rods were removed from the core just three months before so the vessel
could be inspected. Those rods, which were not fully used up, could more
easily support chain reactions than the fully spent fuel.
* * *
* * *
Monday, May 28, 2012 by Common Dreams
Japan's Toxic Tsunami Debris Heads Towards North America
Chris Pallister of the Gulf of Alaska Keeper Organization: "This is more hazardous than oil"
As the heavier debris from the March 2011 tsunami that struck
Japan makes its way across the Pacific Ocean, scientists warn of the
ecological threat of toxic, chemical debris headed towards North
America's western coast.
Chemical contamination "could be a real threat," Dr. M. Sanjayan, the lead scientist at conservation group the Nature Conservancy, tells CBC News. "Finding one drum of, say, paint thinner, or something you might find in your garage, it's not hugely toxic. But if you find 50 of them all washed up on a rocky shore and then breaking and leaking, then you have some problems."
"This is more hazardous than oil," Chris Pallister of the Gulf of Alaska Keeper Organization warns the Homer Tribune. "Entire communities went into the ocean — industrial, household chemicals, anything you can think of in your garage — and it's all coming here. This is like a great big toxic spill that is widely dispersed."
Chris Pallister, who's been cleaning marine debris on Alaska's Montague Island for 15 years, told CNN, "The influx of tsunami debris really concerns us mostly because of the amount of Styrofoam that's coming with it and also the toxic chemicals that are coming. We think they're going to have a really detrimental impact on the environment out here long term."
CBC News: Chemicals in tsunami debris could pose coastal threat
Mother Nature Network: Japan tsunami debris looms off U.S. coasts
Chemical contamination "could be a real threat," Dr. M. Sanjayan, the lead scientist at conservation group the Nature Conservancy, tells CBC News. "Finding one drum of, say, paint thinner, or something you might find in your garage, it's not hugely toxic. But if you find 50 of them all washed up on a rocky shore and then breaking and leaking, then you have some problems."
"This is more hazardous than oil," Chris Pallister of the Gulf of Alaska Keeper Organization warns the Homer Tribune. "Entire communities went into the ocean — industrial, household chemicals, anything you can think of in your garage — and it's all coming here. This is like a great big toxic spill that is widely dispersed."
Chris Pallister, who's been cleaning marine debris on Alaska's Montague Island for 15 years, told CNN, "The influx of tsunami debris really concerns us mostly because of the amount of Styrofoam that's coming with it and also the toxic chemicals that are coming. We think they're going to have a really detrimental impact on the environment out here long term."
* * *
The spill and spread of industrial chemicals across the coastline of British Columbia is a possibility as slower-moving tsunami debris from Japan approaches the west coast, according to experts observing its movements.
The risk of chemical contamination is sizable, especially considering that many of the tsunami-affected areas on the Japanese coast were industrial and used many different types of toxic chemicals in manufacturing operations.
"[Chemical contamination] could be a real threat," said Dr. M. Sanjayan, the lead scientist at conservation group the Nature Conservancy. "For example, it's very hard to imagine how 50 drums [filled] with something could all show up at the same time, unless it's an event like this. That's where it can be a little dangerous. [...]
Dianna Parker of the NOAA notes that the majority of the debris is heavier and slower-moving than the more buoyant items that have been found on coastlines in recent months. Objects that ride high, such as plastic containers, bottles and buoys, travel much faster than intact and possibly dangerous industrial chemical containers. The bulk of the debris pulled out to sea by the tsunami is still suspended north of the main Hawaiian Islands in the Pacific. [...]
The Nature Conservancy and the NOAA believe that publicity surrounding the debris field will bring attention to the fact that ocean-going debris from the tsunami merely added to an ever-growing pile of junk accumulating in the Pacific and on shorelines. The estimated five million tonnes of debris from the Japanese tsunami represents less than one per cent of what's already out there in the Pacific.
* * *
NOAA map as of May 15, 2012 of tsunami debrisMother Nature Network: Japan tsunami debris looms off U.S. coasts
The Pacific Ocean is no stranger to litter, thanks to a big maritime mess known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. But for the past 14 months, a different type of debris has been sailing around the Pacific — not the familiar bits of plastic found in the garbage patch, but some 5 million tons of detritus that washed offshore after the deadly Japanese earthquake and tsunami of March 2011. [...]
While it pales in comparison to the disaster that sent it there, some worry all this debris could pose environmental dangers for the U.S. and Canada, possibly even on par with an oil spill. "This is more hazardous than oil," Chris Pallister of the Gulf of Alaska Keeper Organization tells the Homer Tribune. "Entire communities went into the ocean — industrial, household chemicals, anything you can think of in your garage — and it's all coming here. This is like a great big toxic spill that is widely dispersed." [...]
Nonetheless, many people from Alaska to California say tsunami debris is already flooding in, and they want immediate action. "The time for talk is over," Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, said in a recent statement. "The prospect of debris coming to our shorelines is not just a theory, it is here." Begich and other lawmakers have pushed the Obama administration to allocate emergency funds to study the tsunami debris, and to reconsider a planned budget cut for NOAA's Marine Debris Program.
No comments:
Post a Comment