Showing posts with label fuck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fuck. Show all posts

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Our Fuck You System of Government


Anti-Occupy Crackdowns Highlight Lack of Services
Broke? Can’t afford rent? We don’t give a crap.

Governments are supposed to fulfill the basic needs of their citizens. Ours doesn’t pretend to try.

Sick? Too bad.

Can’t find a job? Tough.

Forget “e pluribus unum.” We need a more accurate motto.

We live under a fuck you system.

Got a problem? The U.S. government has an all-purpose response to whatever ails you: fuck you.

During the ’80s I drove a yellow taxi in New York. Then, as now, there were no public restrooms in the city. At 4 in the morning, with few restaurants or bars open, the coffee I drank to stay awake posed a significant challenge.

It was—it is—insane. People pee. People poop. As basic needs go, toilets are as basic as it gets. Yet the City of New York, with the biggest tax base of any municipality in the United States, didn’t provide any.

So I did what all taxi drivers did. What they still do. I found a side street and a spot between two parked cars. It went OK until a cop caught me peeing under the old elevated West Side Highway, which later collapsed due to lack of maintenance. Perhaps decades of taxi driver urine corroded the support beams.

“You can’t do that here,” said the policeman.

“Where am I supposed to go?” I asked him. “There’s aren’t any restrooms anywhere in town.”

“I know,” he replied before going to get his summons book from his cruiser.

The old “fuck you.” We create the problem, then blame you for the results.

I ran away.

In recent days American mayors have been ordering heavily armed riot police to attack and rob peaceful members of encampments allied with Occupy Wall Street.

Like NYC, which won’t provide public restrooms but arrests public urinators, government officials and their media allies use their own refusal to provide basic public services to justify raids against Occupations.

In the middle of the night on November 15th NYPD goons stormed into Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan. They beat and pepper-sprayed members of Occupy Wall Street and destroyed the books in their library. Citing “unsanitary conditions,” New York’s billionaire mayor, Michael Bloomberg, then told reporters: “I have become increasingly concerned…that the occupation was coming to pose a health and fire safety hazard to the protesters and to the surrounding community.”

Four days before the police attack The New York Times had quoted a city health department statement worrying about the possible spread of norovirus, vomiting, diarrhea and tuberculosis: “It should go without saying that lots of people sleeping outside in a park as we head toward winter is not an ideal situation for anyone’s health.”

So why don’t they give the homeless some of the thousands of abandoned apartment units in New York?

Anyway, according to the Times: “Damp laundry and cardboard signs, left in the rain, have provided fertile ground for mold. Some protesters urinate in bottles, or occasionally a water-cooler jug, to avoid the lines at [the few] public restrooms.

Of course, there’s an obvious solution: provide adequate bathroom facilities—not just for Occupy but for all New Yorkers. But that’s off the table under New York’s fuck you system of government.

Doctors noted a new phenomenon called “Zuccotti cough.” Symptoms are similar to those of “Ground Zero cough” suffered by 9/11 first responders.

Zuccotti is 450 feet away from Ground Zero.

Which brings to mind the fact that the collapse of the World Trade Center towers released 400 tons of asbestos into the air. It was never cleaned up properly. Could Occupiers be suffering the results of sleeping in a should-have-been-Superfund site for two months?

We’ll never know. As under Bush, Obama’s EPA still won’t conduct a 9/11 environmental impact study.

Sick? Wanna know why? fuck you.

One of the authorities’ most ironic complaints about the Occupations is that they attract the mentally ill, drug users and habitually homeless.

To listen to the mayors of Portland, Denver and New York, you’d think the Occupiers beamed in bums and nutcases from outer space.

When mentally disabled people seek help from their government, they get the usual answer: fuck you.

When people addicted to drugs—drugs imported into the U.S. under the watchful eyes of corrupt border enforcement officers—ask their government for help, they are turned away. fuck you again.

When people who lost their homes because their government said “fuck you” to them rather than help turn to the same government to look for safe shelter, again they are told: “fuck you.”

And then, after days and years and decades of shirking their responsibility to provide us with such staples of human survival as places to urinate and defecate and sleep, and food, and medical care, our “fuck you” government has the amazing audacity to blame us, victims of their negligence and corruption and violence, for messing things up.

Which is why we are finally, at long last, starting to say “fuck you” to them.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Campaign Cash, Corruption, Corporate Power

by Laura Flanders - Wednesday, October 27, 2010 by GRITtv

Campaign cash—we're drowning in a flood of it. As Katrina vanden Heuvel noted yesterday on GRITtv, this is on track to be a $5 billion election—and it's not over.

We used to have words for spending like that on politicians: bribery. Remember all that quaint anti-colonial talk about "Independence"? As Zephyr Teachout commented in a meeting I was part of, hosted by the Coffee Party, those founding fathers were all about independence from corruption and prosecuting bribery. Remember the phrase "anti-Trust"?

Now it seems the most we can hope for is “transparency.” Well, Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index is out now, and it's pretty transparent: The U.S. has dropped in the world rankings to 22nd, below Chile and just above Uruguay. “The world's most peaceful countries score the best” reports The UK Guardian—places like Denmark and New Zealand—hmm. Maybe there's a connection. (You'll be relieved to know we're above Somalia.)

Just think how far we've come. Once tea partiers fought corporate power. Now they live off it. Once corruption and bribery were the Axis of Evil. Today they're Supreme Court-confirmed law. It's trust-busting that the courts can't stand.

In this election, poor people will vote on rich candidates covered by even richer corporate media. Bloated on a diet of billions of dollars of anonymous campaign ads, money media are nothing but happy. What would Tom Paine say?

He might say what Zephyr Teachout said. "What our country needs is less corruption and more good old fashioned bribery."

At least then we could prosecute the thieves of our democracy.



vidlink

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

You can say "FUCK" on TV now!

FCC indecency rules on fleeting "f-bombs" struck down
By Agence France-Presse | Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

NY federal appeals court finds FCC's fleeting expletive policy unconstitutionally vague

A US appeals court Tuesday struck down a policy aimed at preventing "indecency" in US broadcasting as a violation of free speech protections, slamming the regulations for their "chilling effect."

The court said the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) policy was an "unconstitutionally vague" guide that violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

In upholding a joint 2006 complaint by broadcast TV networks, New York's Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the policy creates a "chilling effect that goes far beyond the fleeting expletives at issue."

The commission's indecency regulations, developed partly in response to the famous "Seven Words You can Never Say on Television" routine performed by late comedian George Carlin, was upheld by the US Supreme Court in the 1970s.

The ruling Tuesday, however, overturned the enforcement -- and threat of enforcement -- of massive fines for the "single, non-literal use of an expletive" found in a 2004 decision under the administration of former president George W. Bush.

The second circuit's three-judge panel granted a review of the policy after agreeing with broadcasters that it was too "vague" and lacked clear guidelines.

That vagueness, the court said, forced broadcasters to "steer far wider of the unlawful zone" for fear of being fined, with some expletives allowed in a specific context but not others.

For example, while multiple swear words in a war movie were not considered profane or indecent, the court disagreed how the FCC still deemed "a single occurrence of 'fuck'" at an awards show "shocking and gratuitous."

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, in a statement issued after the court's decision, said the commission was reviewing the ruling "in light of our commitment to protect children, empower parents, and uphold the First Amendment."

The Parents Television Channel (PTC), a vocal FCC supporter, meanwhile slammed the court's ruling, which it said greenlit the airing of "unedited profanity at any time of day on broadcast television."

PTC president Tim Winter called on Genachowski and the White House to immediately appeal the decision.

"Let's be clear about what has happened here today: A three-judge panel in New York once again has authorized the broadcast networks unbridled use of the 'f-word' at any time of the day, even in front of children," he said.

"For parents and families around the country, this ruling is nothing less than a slap in their face," Winter added, saying the court's rationale was "devoid of reality" as its decision against the FCC policy's vagueness would see practically all US laws overturned due to a lack of clarity.

The Media Access Project, a group defending free speech in US media, however hailed the move, saying the "score for today's game is First Amendment one, censorship zero."

The FCC's indecency rules, said MAP's vice president Andrew Schwartzman following the decision, "are irredeemably vague and interfere with the creative process. Today's decision vindicates that argument."

The next stop, said Schwartzman, is the Supreme Court, adding: "We're confident that the Justices will affirm this decision."

The FCC's policy grew out of Carlin's landmark "Filthy Words" routine, which triggered a lawsuit taken to the US Supreme Court, and the top court's ruling eventually came to shape indecency rules for all US television and radio.

The appeals court Tuesday also cautioned that any attempt to strictly regulate offensive language would likely fall short.

"The English language is rife with creative ways of depicting sexual or excretory organs or activities," the court said Tuesday, adding that even if the FCC was able to provide a complete list of such expressions, "new offensive and indecent words are invented every day."