Showing posts with label hoarding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hoarding. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Corpocrisy: The Systematic Betrayal of American Workers


by Paul Buchheit


Free market idealists argue that capitalism works for anyone with a little initiative and a willingness to work hard. That might be true if job opportunities were available to everyone. But the facts reveal a lack of opportunity, largely because the very system of capitalism that's supposed to work for everyone is betraying its most productive members.

It's a step-by-step process of hypocrisy disguised as free enterprise:

1. Let the public pay for the research.

Since World War 2 our federal government has played the dominant role in the research of new technologies, with an emphasis on the long-term basic research that painstakingly perfects design while not yet producing revenue. Corporate R&D, on the other hand, is heavy on the profit-making late stages of development.

Government has contributed significantly to the development of today's most modern technologies. Business has taken full advantage. Even during the frenetic growth of the 1990s, industry funding for computer research declined dramatically while government research funding continued to climb. As of 2009 universities were still receiving ten times more science & engineering funding from government than from industry.

2. Use the publicly-funded technologies to double profits in 8 years.

From 2003 to 2011 total corporate profits more than doubled from $900 billion to almost $2 trillion.

A big part of that is the financial industry, which has adapted the (nationally built) Internet to fashion trillion-dollar trading schemes. Up until 1985 financial firms never earned more than 16 percent of domestic corporate profits. Their share recently reached 41 percent.

3. Use the recession as an excuse to cut taxes in half.

For the twenty years prior to the 2008 recession, corporations paid an average annual rate of 22.5% in federal taxes. Since then the average has been 10%.

4. Quietly hoard all the excess money.

Anywhere from $2.2 trillion to $3.4 trillion in cash is being held by non-financial corporations, who have chosen to fatten stockholders rather than invest in new production facilities and the employees needed to make them profitable.

Once again, the financial industry leads the way. Just 12 large banks hold 69 percent of industry assets, close to $8 trillion. But they're not making their money available to consumers or small businesses. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, community banks, which hold less than one-fifth of industry assets, provide over half of all small business loans.

5. Pay existing workers what they earned in 1970.

Less, actually. Average real wages were $17.42 in 2007, down from $19.34 in 1972 (based on 2007 dollars). Wages as a percentage of the economy, at 44% of GDP, are at an all-time low.

Jobs that remain are increasingly low-wage positions. Apple is a good example of the race to the bottom for wages, with an estimated $420,000 profit per employee and a $12 per hour pay rate for its store workers.

6. Eliminate all the other people who helped increase productivity.

Not only are "job creators" failing to create jobs with their cash hoards, but they're also cutting jobs in order to 'streamline' their operations. Evidence comes from The Nation, Market Watch, and Business Insider.

-- Verizon, which made $38 billion in 2008-11 and paid no tax, cut 41,100 jobs.
-- AT&T, which made $9 billion in 20011 and paid no tax, cut 54,000 jobs.
-- Merck, which made $34 billion in 2008-11 and paid a 7% tax, cut 13,000 jobs.

Other leading job-cutters:

-- Citigroup, which made a $28 billion profit in 2010-11 and paid no tax.
-- Boeing, which made $15 billion in profits in 2008-11 and paid no tax.
-- IBM, which made $75 billion in profits in 2008-11 and paid less than 2% in taxes.
-- HP, which $40 billion in profits in 2008-11 and paid an 11% tax.
-- Pepsico, which made a $10 billion profit in 2011 and paid a 6.3% tax.
-- Proctor & Gamble, which made almost $60 billion in profits in 2008-11 and paid 11% in taxes.
-- Google, which avoided about $2 billion in 2011 taxes by shifting revenue to a Bermuda tax haven.

7. Ignore the facts.

And do nothing to address the mistreatment of American workers. CEOs, Congress, and the media are all skilled at this final step of betrayal.

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Assets owned by General Electric; and the Bogus Unemployments Rate

 by Jef, your Spiderlegs Conundrum admin
 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Census.gov, BLS.gov, & the Huffington Post

Primary business units of General Electric, Inc.

Healthcare

Media
¹Minority interest
²Stations which LIN Television owns a minority interest (24%) in

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

GE Aviation is a world-leading provider of commercial and military jet engines and components as well as avionics, electric power, and mechanical systems.

GE Transportation is a global technology leader and supplier to the railroad, marine, drilling, wind and mining industries. GE provides freight and passenger locomotives, railway signaling and communications systems, information technology solutions, marine engines, motorized drive systems for mining trucks and drills, high-quality replacement parts and value added services.

GE Healthcare provides transformational medical technologies and services that are shaping a new age of patient care. Our expertise in medical imaging and information technologies, medical diagnostics, patient monitoring systems, performance improvement, drug discovery, and biopharmaceutical manufacturing technologies is helping clinicians around the world re-imagine new ways to predict, diagnose, inform and treat disease, so their patients can live their lives to the fullest.

GE Capital is one of the world's largest providers of financing helping meet the financing needs for customers in more than 50 countries around the globe. For businesses, large and small, we deliver the capabilities that enable businesses to purchase, lease and distribute equipment, as well as capital for real estate and corporate acquisitions, refinancing and restructurings. For our 100+ million consumer customers, we offer credit cards, retail sales finance programs, home, car and personal loans and credit insurance. 

At GE Energy, solving our customers' toughest challenges is at the core of our business. As the demand for water, fuel, and electricity increases, GE continues to develop innovative products and services that help our customers serve the needs of people all over the world. Whether working with governments and communities to develop critical infrastructures or with suppliers to extend our factories and further globalize our platforms,  GE is building powerful partnerships that help us achieve mutual growth and success.  From our leading expertise to our technological innovation, no one is better equipped to power potential today and for years to come. Water & Process Technologies offers proven solutions and new approaches that can protect your high-value assets, maximize run times, reduce maintenance and save energy. Our leading chemical, filtration and separation technologies have a rich history of results in water and process applications.

NBCUniversal is one of the world’s leading media and entertainment companies in the development, production, and marketing of entertainment, news, and information to a global audience. NBCUniversal owns and operates a valuable portfolio of news and entertainment television networks, a premier motion picture company, significant television production operations, a leading television stations group, and world-renowned theme parks. Comcast Corporation owns a controlling 51% interest in NBCUniversal, with GE holding a 49% stake.

And the business for which GE is most known for...

GE is one of the largest manufacturers of major appliances in the world, producing Monogram®, GE Profile™ and many more brands. Discover how GE appliances deliver their remarkable efficiency. Built with reliability and usability in mind, GE products use the best of technology making life easier every room of the house. Since the day Thomas Edison discovered a better filament for the incandescent lamp, GE has been lighting up the world. 128 years later, we still provide a range of innovative products for consumer, commercial and industrial markets.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So, here you have the industries of: home appliances, lighting, energy (incl. oil & gas), healthcare (incl. pharmaceuticals, accounting, software and technology), finance (investing, commercial loans, individual loans), transportation (rail, freight), aviation (incl defense/military technology and systems), and media.

Do you think they might have a few lobbyists in Washington, DC? Heh, yeah, they have quite the lobbying effort:



2010 Total Lobbying Expenditures: $39,290,000
Subtotal for Parent General Electric: $39,290,000 
General Electric Lobbying by Industry

Industry
Total
$525,000
$80,000
$30,000
$1,730,000
$120,000
$160,000
$534,000
$36,021,000



Two of the items in bold are industries which have had major legislation passed regarding those industries--the finance bill, the healthcare bill. Defense is bolded because because we are embroiled in 5 wars (so far) with others expected.But look at the category in which they spent the bulk of their lobbying cash: Misc. Manufacturing and Distributing.

There are several companies listed when you click that link. I picked Reynolds American because it sounded familiar, which it's the RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company with a new name. GE spent $1,926,881 lobbying for their stake in the tobacco industry.


Some of the lobbying firms GE hired:

Federal Policy Group - $840,000
Capitol Tax Partners -   $840,000
Ernst & Young  -  $600,000

Click on any of the industry links under GE lobbying expenses and you'll see breakdowns for where they spent their money. It's obvious that much of that misc $36 million went toward the defense, healthcare and financial industry lobbies, too, though they fell under misc.

Some other interesting items about GE:

Jeffrey R. Immelt, the chairman and chief executive of General Electric Co. tapped by President Barack Obama as his next top outside economic adviser, will be asked to guide the White House as it attempts to jump-start lackluster job creation and spur a muddled recovery. Immelt told analysts that he'll focus on tax policy and regulation.

GE represents the archetypal company that's hoarding cash, sending jobs overseas, relying on taxpayer bailouts and paying no taxes.

The company is sitting on $79 billion in cash, tops worldwide among non-financial publicly-traded companies, according to a Jan. 10 note by analysts at Standard and Poor's. In fact, GE's cash holdings are about 62 percent more than the next company, Toyota Motor Corp.

One in five American workers is jobless, or severely under-employed at a minimum wage job. The BLS U3 Current Population Survey unemployment rate (the one that is most used by the media, yet the least accurate) has been stuck above 9% for 20 consecutive months, the longest such streak since records began in 1948, according to the Labor Department. Of course, back then they used different numbers, like what the U6 reflects.  

The U3 is based on numbers gained by the Current Population Survey (CPS), which is a monthly survey of about 50,000 households conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sample is selected to represent the civilian noninstitutional population. Respondents are interviewed to obtain information about the employment status of each member of the household 15 years of age and older. However, published data focus on those ages 16 and over. The sample provides estimates for the nation as a whole and serves as part of model-based estimates for individual states and other geographic areas. You see, the U3 is not even real data--it's a sample of data from which the BLS make estimations of the actual numbers. It has no way to include factors like differences due to geographical regions, natural phenomenons (weather, natural disasters)--if several industries in a region layoff workers but the survey is conducted in a region in which there have been no layoffs, this data is not reflected. Yet it plays such an important role in determining such an important statistic.

The U3 does not include: 
  • workers who have given up looking for work but still want a job
  • workers who have given up looking for a job all together because they feel they can't find one
  • were kicked off unemployment
  • workers who have taken a lesser job that they normally would not hold because they cannot find suitable employment
The U6 includes all these people. All in all, U6 suggests a very different employment picture than U3 and today's headlines should be looked at with extreme caution.  The 9.1% (May 2011) number they throw around is an incomplete stat, purposely used to make unemployment seem better than it is, which is bad. People are suffering.

As you can see below (if you click the BLS Table A-15 link), the real unemployment rate for May was not 9.1% , but really 15.8%, and that still includes the U3 numbers which are estimations. I realize that all statistics in a country of 325 million people are estimations to some degree, but to rely upon a statistic which is purposefully incomplete is misleading at best, dishonest for sure. The U3 basis for determining unemployment was devised under Reagan but implemented either at the end of Bush I's term or beginning of Clinton's first term.

Here's how the Unemployment data breaks down in the BLS Table A-15**:
  • U-1 Persons unemployed 15 weeks or longer, as a percent of the civilian labor force
  • U-2 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs, as a percent of the civilian labor force
  • U-3 Current Population Survey--Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force; (official unemployment rate)
  • U-4 Total unemployed plus discouraged workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus discouraged workers
  • U-5 Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other persons marginally attached to the labor force, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force
  • U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force

As the administration struggles to prod businesses to create jobs at home, GE has been busy sending them abroad. Since Immelt took over in 2001, GE has shed 34,000 jobs in the U.S., according to its most recent annual filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. But it's added 25,000 jobs overseas. At the end of 2009, GE employed 36,000 more people abroad than it did in the U.S. In 2000, it was nearly the opposite.

And rather than invest in the U.S., the company has decided to look elsewhere. In 2008 and 2009, GE decided to "indefinitely" reinvest prior-year earnings outside the country, according to SEC filings. That's helped the firm lower its tax rate. In 2009, GE effectively had a negative tax rate, thanks to the $498 million loss it booked on U.S. operations versus the $10.8 billion in earnings it booked abroad. GE realized a $1.1 billion tax benefit in 2009.

"...we think GE has something to teach businesses all across America," Obama told a crowd of GE workers at a plant in Schenectady, New York.

GE continues to benefit from lower costs thanks to the $55 billion of outstanding taxpayer-backed debt its finance unit has issued under a crisis-era program that was supposed to be for banks. All told, GE and its subsidiary, GE Capital, accessed nearly $100 billion through programs created by the Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to combat frozen credit markets.

And the GE CEO is Obama's go to guy for improving the economy and creating jobs. Does anyone else feel like this is the script for a really bad Twilight Zone episode? Is their a worse person Obama could have picked for this job? Maybe Lloyd Blankfein (Goldman Sachs CEO).

**NOTE: Persons marginally attached to the labor force are those who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the past 12 months. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not currently looking for work. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Amidst record unemployment, US companies hoard $1 trillion of cash

(Knowing this, why should employees ever be loyal to their employers after this level of betrayal? Corporate America is evil and serves only the interests of the very rich. It should be destroyed and rebuilt into a system that favors the people.--jef)


Amidst record unemployment, US companies hoard $1 trillion of cash
By Reuters - Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. companies are hoarding almost $1 trillion in cash but are unlikely to spend on expanding their business and hiring new employees due to continuing uncertainty about the strength of the economy, Moody's Investors Service said on Tuesday.

As the economy stabilizes companies are also more likely to spend on share repurchases and mergers and acquisitions, Moody's added.

Companies cut costs, reduced investment in plants and equipment and downsized operations in order to boost cash holdings during the recession. As the corporate bond market reopened many companies also boosted cash levels by selling debt and refinancing near-term debt maturities.

The US unemployment rate, meanwhile, sits at a whopping 9.2 percent. (A graph of the unemployment rates state by state can be found here).

Nonfinancial U.S. companies are sitting on $943 billion of cash and short-term investments, as of mid-year 2010, compared with $775 billion at the end of 2008, Moody's said. This would be enough to cover a year's worth of capital spending and dividends and still have $121 billion left over, it said.

However, "we believe companies are looking for greater certainty about the economy and signs of a permanent increase in sales before they let go of their cash hoards, which they suffered so much to build," Moody's said in a report.

"Given low demand and capacity utilization within certain industries, companies are wary of investing their cash in new capacity and adding workers, thereby doing little to abbreviate the jobless recovery," it added.

Around one quarter of the cash is held overseas and is unlikely to be repatriated to the United States, Moody's said.

Meanwhile only 20 companies hold a large portion of corporate cash balances, with $346 billion on their balance sheets, or 37 percent of the total, Moody's said.

Cisco Systems has the largest cash balance, at $39.86 billion, while Microsoft is second with $36.79 billion, Moody's said. Google has the third-largest balance with $30.06 billion, followed by Oracle with $23.64 billion and Ford Motor Co at $21.89 billion.

Technology companies held the most cash as a sector, at $207 billion, followed by pharmaceuticals with $124 billion, energy at $105 billion, and consumer products with $101 billion, Moody's said.

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

The Conscience of the Very, Very Rich: Buffett, Gates, Rockefeller and ...

The Great Marginalization
By CARL GINSBURG

Of all the farcical notions put forth during this time of high farce, casting America as “broke” places way up there on the list, as trillions of dollars are being stockpiled in the face of a national downsizing and its attendant growth in misery. Here we sit, a captive national audience to the president’s seemingly daily farce, “We are all in this together”.

Instances of hoarding in U.S. history are many, but the current example stands out for its enduring quality, as Congress reaches deep into corporate pockets, with occasional forays into legislation of the extreme incremental variety. Profits are up 41 percent since Obama’s election; yet half of American workers have suffered a job loss or a cut in hours or wages over the past 30 months--- hardly the recipe for togetherness.

More farce: that irresponsibility is the root of poverty, a stalwart theme in American political theater, with the latest reminder from Treasury Secretary Geithner in a New York Times op-ed this month, saluting Americans for “saving more” and “borrowing more responsibly”. These instructions from the government’s top economic point man were imparted in the face of continued wage stagnation, high foreclosure rates and new forms of financial foolery.

Now enter stage left: the ”Great Givers”, they come in the form of American billionaires proposing to give away half their wealth. Beware strangers bearing gifts.

The billionaire pledge – a broadside of noblesse oblige – was formulated by none other than two of the planet’s leading mega-billionaires, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates. These two American moneybags are imploring fellow prophets of profit to address global suffering by earmarking not less than fifty per cent of personal wealth for charity. First discussed at a dinner in May 2009, the specifics are just now surfacing thanks to Carol J. Loomis in the June 16 issue of Fortune.

According to Loomis, Buffett and Gates, who share a commitment to charity and to the Democratic Party, summoned a group of billionaires to dinner in New York City. David Rockefeller -- whose granddad cornered the market in kerosene, then gasoline – played host and invited this billionaire boys club to share their calling. Two subsequent dinners were held, expanding the group invited to take the plunge to about thirty. Areas of charitable concern shared by America’s very richest, Loomis says, include “education, culture, hospitals and health, the environment, public policy, the poor generally.” Generally.

Details are scarce because participating billionaires were promised privacy -- privacy being a constitutional commitment to enormous wealth. One detail that did get out was the name Buffett assigned his file on this new initiative: “Great Givers”.

It would appear that the ability to give greatly stops at the factory door. Buffett’s billions, for example, include holdings in Wal-Mart, a company fresh from victory in Chicago where, after years of resistance by community forces, construction of its first mega-store was just given a green light. Times as they are, with “jobless recovery” taken to new heights and millions looking for work, Wal-Mart offered a wage of $8.75 per hour to seal the deal. The amount Wal-Mart agreed to pony up is 50 cents over the Illinois minimum; still, at under $20,000 per year gross, no one would argue that it constitutes a living wage. Such are the elements of Great Giving.

Buffett’s profits are not tied exclusively to low wages stateside; his Wal-Mart earnings are a result of paying the lowest garment wages in the world, according to labor rights advocates. Wal-Mart has started moving some of its garment factories out of China, where garment workers have been making the princely sum of $147 per month, to Bangladesh, where monthly earnings total $64, the lowest wage of its kind. In this world of farce these wages are linked to Bangladesh’s low literacy rate—55 percent. Had workers only acquired educations, the master thespians of farce would say, wages would be higher.

It’s not fair, however, to solely tie Buffett’s billions to uneducated Bangladeshis.

This Great Giver also bought a stake in Goldman Sachs and its Ivy-educated money managers, doing his part to rescue the financial system by transferring $5 billion to America’s gilded investment bank (in exchange for a 10 percent per annum return). Yes, this is the same Goldman that last month admitted “a mistake” in selling subprime mortgage bonds destined to collapse; the same Goldman that set aside $9.3 billion the first half of this year for salary and bonuses; and, yes, the same Goldman that orchestrated speculation in the world wheat crop with disastrous results, according to Frederick Kaufman’s cover story in the July issue of Harper’s, “The Food Bubble.” Undoubtedly, Buffett’s due diligence uncovered the following when sizing up the Goldman investment:
“The history of food took an ominous turn in 1991, at a time when no one was paying much attention. That was the year Goldman Sachs decided our daily bread might make an excellent investment…. [W]ith accustomed care and precision, Goldman’s analysts went about transforming food into a concept. They selected eighteen commodifiable ingredients and contrived a financial elixir that included cattle, coffee, cocoa, corn, hogs, and a variety or two of wheat…. They weighted the investment value of each element… that could be expressed as single manifestation, to be known thenceforward as the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index….

“Since Goldman’s innovation, hundreds of billions of new dollars had overwhelmed the actual supply of and actual demand for wheat….

“In 2008, for the first time since such statistics have been kept, the proportion of the world’s population without enough to eat ratcheted upward. The ranks of the hungry had increased in a single year, the most abysmal increase in all of human history.”
(pp. 27-28)
Clarifying what the Great Giver Buffett means by the poor generally.

Buffett’s Goldman investment remains solid, as the SEC fined Goldman for its “mistake” what amounted to little more than petty cash -- $550 million. It was, according to finance professor Charles Geisst, “like passing around the church collection plate and collecting a few extra bucks for sins.” Geisst summed it up this way: “This is unlikely to change much at all. I think it will be business as usual right away.” More money for Buffett to give greatly.

Warren Buffett’s fellow Giver of Great Gifts, Bill Gates, has diversified his holdings as well. But his tens of billions result chiefly from the company he co-founded and led for decades, Microsoft, where profits remain very strong. “Microsoft Still Earnings Powerhouse,” barked the headline in USA Today, July 23, 2010. In its fledgling years, profits on Gates’ software were reportedly 70 per cent annually. Otherwise, after all, you don’t make upwards of $50 billion charging cost plus five percent.

Current returns for this scion of the responsible class were reported at 48 per cent, as Windows 7, the latest software batch out of Microsoft, led the company’s product pack. “It certainly shows that Office and Windows franchises are as strong as ever and delivering huge revenue,” analyst Brendan Barnicle told the Wall Street Journal recently. Indeed, annual sales have hit new records year after year, tripling to $62.5 billion in fiscal 2010. Net income for Gates’ Microsoft grew from $9.4 billion per year a decade ago to $24.1 billion this year.

Another way to gauge Gates’s billions is by catching a glimpse of the multitudes of students priced out of the computer market – thanks in part to that Great Giver’s expensive software – lined up daily at community college libraries for some free access to computers, each machine an expression of Gates’ creative commitment to profit in the +40 percent range – a gift Gates gave himself that keeps on giving. As Gates told Fortune: “The diversity of American giving is part of its beauty.”