Tuesday, March 8, 2011

The Corporate Colonization of Our Democracy

Monday, March 7, 2011 by CommonDreams.org
by Christopher Hall
The United States of America has gotten so large, certain regions or even states, are taking on the same kind of burdens that third world colonized people have elsewhere. Americans are being colonized by a corporate-government complex right here in our own backyard.

In parts of Asia, Central and South America, and in the whole of Africa, colonization has long since created the "slave-in-place" model that worked only when the indigenous people behaved. This required a puppet ruler be put into place by the US and European countries, who have been colonizing in these continents for centuries. When it has worked for the empire countries, they have gotten along with their selected ruling elite who governed on behalf of the foreign corporations, and not at all on behalf of their citizens who suffered impoverished lives, extracting their own natural resources to hand over to the empire.

When it has not worked, is when the people resisted the colonization efforts, and we all know India as one example. Recently, with new technology, people have been getting upset about their living conditions in colonized (or even so-called post-colonized) regions, where they all get the tweets about how great life in the first world is, but suffer horrible poverty and joblessness at home in the third world.

Americans already know how good life is supposed to be in the first world, with "You can have it your way," and other $1.99 faux American Dream statements, but what's happening today is that corporations are controlling American government just like the colonizers did around the globe, and as a result, over the last several decades, life has gotten harder and worse for Americans: actually, they really aren't having it their way.

The very same colonialism we have conducted overseas has now come home to roost here in America, and that was a deep irony just waiting to happen. This comes directly from a situation where private sector corporations are funding certain US candidates to get elected, then paying countless lobbyists to influence them all day long once in office, so the laws of the cities, counties, states and federal government favor the corporations. This means people in America are getting burdened just like people in the third world, where the government does not work for them, but rather, works for the power base, the big corporate money interests: favoring the financial sector, outsourcing manufacturing jobs, increasing productivity making the worker work harder, and so on, to maximize profit.

There is always some collusion going on between the upper end of the corporate sector and their elected, lobbied politicians to control the worker on the left and the consumer on the right -- one and the same person, world-wide. Indeed, the corporations view the people as their workers and consumers -- exactly like a flock to feed and fleece, and the US Government is seen facilitating this under direct corporate supervision, functioning like an HR department with laws in place of policies.

Clearly, the corporations prefer their consumers who pay them, over their workers, who cost them money. Indeed, for many Americans, it is this problematic duality that corporations exploit, and the people get very upset sometimes, here and around the world.

In Wisconsin, the governor is clearly in the court of the corporate ruling elite, and we all knew that, long before the prank call. He has a whole state to rule over like a puppet corporate dictator. If more corporate elite ruling politicians are elected by discontented but highly mistaken people on the right, there will just be greater discontentment for all people as puppet dictators are elected in lavishly, corporate funded political campaigns.

Government staff employees paid $60k--$120k aren't necessarily more out to get you than private sector power brokers who make millions and billions. But the elected politicians are different: they are embraced by the corporations during the candidate-funding-election process, and never let go of once they win and get into office. They often are already on the inside long before they run for office.

Have you noticed that people vote, they don't lobby, and that corporations lobby, they don't vote? Corporations lobby 24/7/365, and have the money and connections to do so, while the rest of us 308 million Americans are pretty much ignored by the corporate sponsored politicians who haven't the time to listen to the small people, since they are so busy listening to the big people.

Across the country, Americans should all join in Denial Of Service (DOS) attacks directed at our politicians and demand all of their time until we feel like we have gotten back our government of, by and for the people. Until then, America will continue to be colonized, where the ruling class will exploit Americans for their labor-consumer function: they will pay less for labor, extract the most from the consumer, all without killing them both, and pocket the balance for profit.

It used to be that all of your labor and consumption was kept on the family farm and not laundered through the corporations. The time has come to find a contemporary way of having a greater say over our persons who labor and consume so we pocket the difference.

Beware the Invisible Hand of Privatization

Monday, March 7, 2011 by CommonDreams.org
by Willie Pelote, Sr.
In California, the state government currently spends more than $34 billion a year paying private contractors to do jobs that civil servants can perform for half the cost. Another $900 million of taxpayer funds is wasted annually propping up the state’s failed enterprise zone program. Common sense dictates that any proposal to balance the state budget begin here.

Instead, what is being implemented in state capitals across the country are plans to eradicate traditional retirement and health care benefits for civil servants and, in some cases, to return civil servants to 19th century working conditions by eliminating their First Amendment right to assemble, organize, and bargain collectively as free citizens.

These developments are part and parcel of an ongoing strategy to steal our taxpayer dollars by redirecting them from public services and democratic institutions and into the pockets of private companies and individuals through wasteful subsidy programs and corrupt private contracting practices in government.

Case in point, the Little Hoover Commission recently recommended that retirement benefits for new and current public employees be essentially eliminated and replaced with 401(k)-style plans in order to save taxpayers money.

What the Little Hoover Commission left out of their report and avoided saying in testimony before the state legislature was that no one with a 401(k) has ever been able to afford to retire with one.

They also failed to mention that 401(k) plans are about three times more expensive to maintain than traditional, defined benefit retirement plans due to the fees that Wall Street investors charge to manage a 401(k).

It’s akin to the way technology consultants have repeatedly taken advantage of Sacramento’s lack of computer know-how by promising quick fixes for low prices on projects that routinely turn out to be more complicated and expensive.

Clearly, the move to eliminate traditional retirement benefits for civil servants is simply another attempt by Wall Street and their business associates to redirect our hard-earned tax dollars into their pockets.

As if bringing on the Great Recession through a national housing crisis and financial meltdown wasn’t enough, these same vultures now want Main Street to pay for cleaning up their economic mess.

In light of the billions of taxpayer dollars given to bail out the financial institutions responsible for our current economic crisis, the public is right to be concerned over how our tax dollars are being spent.

That’s why we need to eliminate the more than $34 billion worth of private contracting in state government along with wasteful tax subsidy programs that routinely funnel billions every year to private companies with no oversight.

With regard to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s bid to end people's First Amendment right to assemble, organize, and bargain collectively as free citizens, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has astutely pointed out that this move masks a darker, more lucrative purpose.

Krugman writes that Walker’s budget bill is designed not only to eliminate collective bargaining rights for civil servants, but to facilitate the sale of taxpayer-owned heating, cooling, and electricity plants to private companies “with or without solicitation of bids, for any amount that the department determines to be in the best interest of the state.”

In fact, “no approval or certification of the public service commission is necessary” for the sale of taxpayer-owned plants or for the contracting out of the operation of these state institutions.

Here again, we find the market’s so-called invisible hand preparing to pilfer our hard earned tax dollars out of our collective pocket.

Instead of eliminating traditional retirement and health care benefits for grandma and other dedicated civil servants, we need to institute a surcharge on financial service transactions like stock trades to make sure that Wall Street cleans up this mess that the rest of us in California, the United States, and the rest of the world are suffering through.

Earliest evidence for magic mushroom use in Europe

06 March 2011 - New Scientist

EUROPEANS may have used magic mushrooms to liven up religious rituals 6000 years ago. So suggests a cave mural in Spain, which may depict fungi with hallucinogenic properties - the oldest evidence of their use in Europe.

The Selva Pascuala mural, in a cave near the town of Villar del Humo, is dominated by a bull. But it is a row of 13 small mushroom-like objects that interests Brian Akers at Pasco-Hernando Community College in New Port Richey, Florida, and Gaston Guzman at the Ecological Institute of Xalapa in Mexico. They believe that the objects are the fungi Psilocybe hispanica, a local species with hallucinogenic properties.

Like the objects depicted in the mural, P. hispanica has a bell-shaped cap topped with a dome, and lacks an annulus - a ring around the stalk. "Its stalks also vary from straight to sinuous, as they do in the mural," says Akers (Economic Botany, DOI: 10.1007/s12231-011-9152-5).

This isn't the oldest prehistoric painting thought to depict magic mushrooms, though. An Algerian mural that may show the species Psilocybe mairei is 7000 to 9000 years old.

One More Jobs Mirage

Some New Economy
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

The announcement on March 4 that 192,000 new jobs were created in February was greeted with a sigh of relief. But the number is just more smoke and mirrors, as I will show shortly. First, let’s pretend the jobs are real. What areas of the economy produced the jobs?

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 152,000 of the jobs or 79 per cent are in private services, consisting of: 11,700 jobs in wholesale trade, 22,000 in transportation and warehousing, 36,400 in administration and waste services (of which 15,500 are temporary help services), and 36,200 in ambulatory health care services and nursing and residential care facilities. Entertainment, waitresses and bartenders accounted for 20,000. Repair and maintenance, laundry services, and membership associations accounted for 14,000.

As one who has often reported the monthly payroll jobs breakdown, I am struck by the fact that these categories are the ones that have accounted for job growth for year after year. How can this be? How can Americans, who have had no growth in their real incomes and who are foreclosed from their homes and maxed out on credit card debt, car payments, and student loans, spend more every month in bars and restaurants? How can a few service areas of the economy grow when nothing else is?

The answer is that there were not 192,000 new jobs. Statistician John Williams estimates the reported gain was overstated by about 230,000 jobs. In other words, about 38,000 jobs were lost in February.

There are various reasons that job gains are overstated and losses understated. One is the BLS’s “birth-death model.” This is a way of estimating the net of non-reported new jobs from business start-ups and job losses from business shut-downs. During recessions this model doesn’t work, because the model is based on good times when new jobs always exceed lost jobs. On the “death” side, if a company goes out of business because of recession and, therefore, doesn’t report its payroll, the BLS assumes the previously reported employees are still in place. On the “birth” side, the BLS adds 30,000 jobs to the monthly numbers as an estimate of new start-ups.

Williams estimates the “death” side is really reducing employment by about 200,000 per month, and the “birth” side is stillborn. Therefore, “the BLS continues regularly to overestimate monthly growth in payroll employment by roughly 230,000 jobs.” The benchmark revisions of payroll jobs bear out Williams. The last two benchmark revisions resulted in a reduction of previously reported employment gains of about 2 million jobs.

Another indication is that despite 10 years of population growth, there are 8 to 9 million fewer Americans employed today than a decade ago.

Some “New Economy” we have. If only we could have the old one back.

Monday, March 7, 2011

The Simpsons take on Big Pharma


The.Simpsons.S22E15

“I don’t think actual newts are this slimy.”



vidlink

TSA, DHS plan massive rollout of surveillance vans with long-distance X-ray scanners

Sunday, March 06, 2011
by Mike Adams

Newly-released documents obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) reveal that the US Depart of Homeland Security has been working on plans to roll out a new wave of mobile surveillance technologies at train stations, stadiums and streets. These new technologies will track your eye movements, capture and record your facial dimensions for face-recognition processing, bathe you in X-rays to look under your clothes, and even image your naked body using whole-body infrared images that were banned from consumer video cameras because they allowed the camera owners to take "nude" videos of people at the beach.

Most importantly, many of these technologies are designed to be completely hidden, allowing the government to implement "covert inspection of moving subjects." You could be walking down a hallway at a sports stadium, in other words, never knowing that you're being bathed in X-rays from the Department of Homeland Security, whose operators are covertly looking under your clothes to see if you're carrying any weapons.

Roving vans to "track eye movements"

According to a Forbes.com article (http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenbe...), one project pursued by DHS using technology from Siemens would "mount backscatter x-ray scanners and video cameras on roving vans, along with other cameras on buildings and utility poles, to monitor groups of pedestrians, assess what they carried, and even track their eye movements."

Another project involved developing "a system of long range x-ray scanning to determine what metal objects an individual might have on his or her body at distances up to thirty feet."

We already know that the U.S. government has purchased 500 vans using covert backscatter technology to covertly scan people on the streets (http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenbe...). They're called "Z Backscatter Vans, or ZBVs."

This is all part of the U.S. government's new wave of police state surveillance that aims to track and irradiate innocent civilians who have committed no crime. Under the new Janet Napolitano regime, all Americans are now considered potential terrorists, and anyone can be subjected to government-sanctioned radiation scanning at any time, without their knowledge or approval.

And don't think these efforts will be limited merely to backscatter technology: The TSA is now testing full-power, deep-penetrating X-ray machines (like the ones that deliver chest X-rays in hospitals) in order to check people for bombs they may have swallowed. Yes, Janet Napolitano now wants to look inside your colon! And they're willing to X-ray everyone -- without their consent -- in order to do that.

Read the documents yourself

If you have trouble believing the U.S. government is unleashing a new wave of police state covert scanning vans on to the streets of America, you can read the documents yourself -- all 173 pages. They're available on the EPIC website at: http://epic.org/privacy/body_scanne...

EPIC calls these vans "mobile strip search devices" because they give the federal government technology to look under your clothes without your permission or consent. It's also being done without probable cause, so it's a violation of the Fourth Amendment protections that are guaranteed to Americans under the Bill of Rights.

"It's a clear violation of the fourth amendment that's very invasive, not necessarily effective, and poses all the same radiation risks as the airport scans," said EPIC attorney Ginger McCall, in the Forbes article (above).

Huge health risks to the population

It's not just the privacy issues that raise red flags here, of course: It's also the fact that the U.S. government has no respect whatsoever for the health of its citizens who are being subjected to these radiation emitting devices. Even while the TSA refuses to release testing results from its own naked body scanners, DHS keeps buying more machines (and more powerful machines) that will only subject travelers to yet more radiation.

As we've already reported here on NaturalNews.com, numerous scientists are already on the record warning that the TSA's backscatter "naked body scanners" could cause breast cancer, sperm mutation and other health problems (http://www.naturalnews.com/030607_n...).

But the U.S. government doesn't seem to care what happens to your health. Their position is that their "right" to know what you're carrying under your clothes or inside your body overrides your right to privacy or personal health. All they have to do is float a couple of fabricated terrorism scare stories every few months, and then use those "threats" as justification for violating the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens are very turn.

The real question in all this, of course, is how far will this go? The TSA is already reaching down your pants and feeling up peoples' genitals as part of the "security" measures. Will DHS soon just start subjecting people to body cavity searches as a necessary security requirement before entering a football stadium, for example? Will Americans now be X-rayed with cancer-causing ionizing radiation -- without their awareness or consent -- merely because they are walking down the street or boarding a train?

That seems to be the case. And as you can readily tell from all this, it's getting harder and harder for the fast-dwindling group of deniers to claim America isn't already a police state. The USA is fast becoming a high-tech version of the very worst police state tyrannies witnessed throughout human history. The only difference is that now they have "science" on their side with the coolest new technology that can violate your rights and irradiate your body in a hundred different ways, with high-resolution images and digital storage devices.

I suppose if all this were being done to really stop international terrorists, that might be one thing. But what has become increasingly clear in observing the government's behavior in this realm is that the U.S. government now considers Americans to be the enemy -- especially those who have the gall to defend their Constitutionally-protected freedoms or question the unjustified centralization of power taking place right now in Washington.

The DHS is America's new secret police. And their cameras are pointing inward, into the everyday lives of Americans; not outward, aimed at international terrorists.

When the price of security becomes forfeiting your liberty, the source of the "terror" is no longer the terrorists but your own government. Isn't this the lesson that history has taught us well?

Magnetic north shifting towards Russia

Polar Shift Inevitable
Sun Mar 6, 2011

Scientists say the magnetic pole, which has been in the icy wilderness of Canada for two centuries, is relocating towards Russia at 40 miles per year.

Surveys show the magnetic north pole is moving faster, threatening everything from the safety of modern transportation systems to the traditional navigation routes of migrating animals.

Scientists say that magnetic north, which for two centuries has been in the icy wilderness of Canada, is currently relocating towards Russia at a rate of about 40 miles a year, reported The Independent.

The speed of its movement has increased by one-third in the past decade, prompting speculation that the field could be about to "flip," causing compasses to invert and point south rather than north, something that happens between three and seven times every million years.

The phenomenon is already causing problems in the field of aviation, added the British daily.

The current rate of the magnetic north's movement away from Canada's Ellesmere Island is throwing out compasses by roughly one degree every five years.

Geologists believe that magnetic north pole (which is different from the true North Pole, the axis on which the Earth spins) moves around due to changes in the planet's molten core, which contains liquid iron. They first located it in 1831, and have been trying to follow its progress ever since.

Records indicate that the pole's location barely moved in the early decades, but in about 1904, it began tracking north-east at a rate of about nine miles a year.

That speed increased significantly from about 1989, possibly because of a "plume" of magnetism deep below ground.

The pole is now believed to be heading towards Siberia at about 37 miles each year.

“Earth's magnetic field is changing in time. And as far as we know, it has always been changing in time," geophysicist Jeffrey Love of the US Geological Survey in Colorado was quoted by the British daily as saying.

Motorists illegally detained at Florida toll booths for using large bills

TX Rep files anti-body-scanner bill

Written by: Andy Hogue - 3/4/2011

A freshman Representative filed a bill to penalize airport body scanner operators: Including TSA agents.

Can they do that to a federal agent? Bill author Rep. David Simpson (R-Longview) thinks so. And he's not alone, with 18 co-sponsors from both parties (see list below) and a few organizations.

The bill, HB 1938, makes it a civil penalty for anyone working in a locally owned airport to install or operate whole-body imaging equipment -- "including a device that uses backscatter x-rays or millimeter waves, that creates a visual image of a person's unclothed body and is intended to detect concealed objects," the bill read.

The penalty is capped at $1,000 per day per violation.

The bill is supported by the Travis County Republican Party, the Travis County Libertarian Party, ACLU-Texas, and Austin-based Texans for Accountable Government which pushed for a city of Austin resolution against the scanners.

Simpson may also have the backing of U.S. Congressman John Carter of Texas, a member of the U.S. House Appropriations and Homeland Security committees.

"On Thursday I met with U.S. Congressman John Carter ... to discuss strategies for stopping the federal Transportation Safety Administration’s implementation of unconstitutional and unreasonable searches of U.S. citizens as a condition of travel," Simpson wrote in his weekly blog post.

If it becomes law, Texas will be one of at least two states opposing the measures, including New Jersey and New Hampshire.

A press conference on the bill originally scheduled for Monday has been postponed.

Co-authors so far include: Reps. Jose Aliseda (R-Beeville), Leo Berman (R-Tyler), Joe Deshotel (D-Beaumont), Allen Fletcher (R-Tomball), Dan Flynn (R-Vann), John V. Garza (R-San Antonio), Larry Gonzales (R-Round Rock), Ryan Guillen (D-Rio Grande City), Charlie Howard (R-Sugar Land), Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola), Jason Isaac (R-Dripping Springs), Jim Landtroop (R-Big Spring), Jodie Laubenberg (R-Rockwall), Charles Perry (R-Lubbock), Debbie Riddle (R-Houston), Senfronia Thompson (D-Houston), and James White (R-Hillister).

The Stupidity of Not Raising Taxes on the Rich When Budgets Are Tight

By Larry Beinhart, AlterNet
Posted on March  7, 2011

The current economy is routinely and universally referred to as the worst recession since the Great Depression.

It makes sense, therefore, to look back at government tax and spending policies during the Depression and what the results were.
1932 -- Hoover raises the top tax rate from to 25 to 63 percent.

1933 -- Roosevelt comes into office. He begins spending at the same time that new tax hike comes into effect. The Depression bottoms out.

1934 -- Recovery begins. The GNP rises 7.7 percent, unemployment falls to 21.7 percent.

1935 -- New government spending on public works and rural electrification. A push to strengthen labor and raise wages. New taxes through the creation of Social Security.

The GNP grows another 8.1 percent, and unemployment continues to fall.

1936 -- The top tax rate is raised again. This time to 79 percent.

GNP grows a record 14.1 percent; unemployment falls even further.

1937 -- Roosevelt is afraid of deficits! He cuts spending for 1937.

There's a new recession. It continues for a year.

1939 -- The U.S. borrows, resumes deficit spending, this time on a military build-up. The recession ends.

1941 -- America enters World War II.

In economic terms, it's the New Deal on steroids. The top tax rate goes up to 91 percent. Nonetheless, government spending is so high that by 1945 the deficit is 123 percent of GDP. Unemployment is ended by employing 16 million people directly in the armed forces and millions more are employed producing war material and supporting the military.

The Great Depression is finally over.

When taxes were raised the economy improved. Every time. Deficits had no negative effect on the economy. Indeed, when deficits were at their highest, the economy boomed.

After spending was cut -- to balance the budget -- a recession immediately followed. When taxes were raised and government spending resumed -- with deficits -- that recession ended.

When taxes were raised again, and government spending went sky high, the Great Depression finally ended.

So here we are. We refused to raise taxes. The recession continues. Now, we're going to cut spending.

Bill proposes DPS checkpoints

By Nolan Hicks, Thursday, March 3, 2011

AUSTIN — The Department of Public Safety would be given the power to establish driver's license and insurance checkpoints along state roads as part of a broader border security bill introduced Thursday.

The checkpoint provision is part of a bill that supporters say would crack down on drug cartels and human smuggling rings operating in Texas.

It would require that every person booked into prison in Texas have their citizenship checked. It also would increase criminal penalties for gang and cartel members and increase fines for drug crimes.

“We want to have a package that's focused on solving our unique situation here in Texas,” said state Sen. Tommy Williams, R-The Woodlands, who chairs the Senate committee on transportation and homeland security.

DPS officials have asked for the power to do checkpoints, claiming it's necessary to help disrupt the operations of drug cartels and human smugglers; however, legislation has failed because it usually was enveloped by political controversy.

“This bill has several provisions that appear to require state and local law officers to enforce federal immigration laws, which invites discrimination against citizens of Hispanic descent and legal immigrants,” said state Sen. Carlos Uresti, D-San Antonio.

Williams defended the proposal and said it would help reduce the number of uninsured drivers on the road and would give officers an additional chance at stopping illegal activity.

“There are actually local jurisdictions that do this,” Williams said.

He said agencies would still have to have probable cause to search vehicles and that current policy had “unnecessarily restrained the Department of Public Safety.”

Other Democrats voiced concern that the bill might become a vehicle for legislation from conservative House Republicans that would provide for an Arizona-style crackdown on illegal immigrants.

“What concerns me is that any omnibus bill can become a vehicle for other things which I would not support,” said Sen. Eddie Lucio, D-Brownsville. “I would hate to see his bill amended to include Arizona-style legislation.”

The bill includes new requirements that would mandate that local law enforcement organizations check the citizenship status of everyone booked into prison. It also would require that state prisons officials keep a count of the number of illegal immigrants in state prisons.

“It's an expensive proposition — we think it could be as high as $200 million,” Williams said of the cost to house illegal immigrants in state prisons. “Because there's not a census being taken, it's very difficult to know how good that number is.”

'This is our Last Chance to Wrestle America Away From the Grubby Hands of the Greedy Rich.' (2 artciles)

Michael Moore in Madison
Saturday, March 5, 2011 by The Nation
by John Nichols

Filmmaker Michael Moore will march with members of Madison Firefighters Local 311 to the Wisconsin Capitol today and join a mass rally at the King Street entrance around 2 p.m.

Moore will speak up for union rights and cheer on the mass protests at a rally organized by the Wisconsin Wave movement, which has been backed by Wisconsin labor, farm, community and grassroots groups. Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin, Mayor Dave Cieslewicz, former Mayor Paul Soglin, State Rep. Kelda Helen Roys, Liberty Tree Foundation director and Wisconsin Wave organizer Ben Manski and others will also speak, while singers Ryan Bingham, Jon Langford and Michelle Shocked will also join the rally.

Moore, a long-time supporter of labor rights, is the director and producer of Bowling for Columbine, Fahrenheit 9/11, Sicko, and Capitalism: A Love Story, four of the top nine highest-grossing documentaries of all time. His breakthrough film, Roger & Me, chronicled the deindustrialization of his his hometown of Flint, Michigan, along with the struggles of blue-collar workers.

Moore says of the protests against Governor Scott Walker’s budget repair bill – which would strip most public employee and teacher unions of their collective bargaining rights:
“This movement--we'll call it the 'Madison Movement' (after both the town where it was born and the president who wrote our Bill of Rights) is exploding across the Midwest. It will be unlike anything you've seen in recent U.S. history. It is built on this one truth: Corporations have taken over our country and we know this is our last chance to wrestle America away from the grubby hands of the greedy rich.”


+++++

Michael Moore: The Smug Wealthy Have Gone Too Far -- And We're Finally Fighting Back
By Michael Moore, MichaelMoore.com
Posted on March 6, 2011

America is not broke.

Contrary to what those in power would like you to believe so that you'll give up your pension, cut your wages, and settle for the life your great-grandparents had, America is not broke. Not by a long shot. The country is awash in wealth and cash. It's just that it's not in your hands. It has been transferred, in the greatest heist in history, from the workers and consumers to the banks and the portfolios of the uber-rich.

Today just 400 Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans combined.

Let me say that again. 400 obscenely rich people, most of whom benefited in some way from the multi-trillion dollar taxpayer "bailout" of 2008, now have more loot, stock and property than the assets of 155 million Americans combined. If you can't bring yourself to call that a financial coup d'état, then you are simply not being honest about what you know in your heart to be true.

And I can see why. For us to admit that we have let a small group of men abscond with and hoard the bulk of the wealth that runs our economy, would mean that we'd have to accept the humiliating acknowledgment that we have indeed surrendered our precious Democracy to the moneyed elite. Wall Street, the banks and the Fortune 500 now run this Republic -- and, until this past month, the rest of us have felt completely helpless, unable to find a way to do anything about it.

I have nothing more than a high school degree. But back when I was in school, every student had to take one semester of economics in order to graduate. And here's what I learned: Money doesn't grow on trees. It grows when we make things. It grows when we have good jobs with good wages that we use to buy the things we need and thus create more jobs. It grows when we provide an outstanding educational system that then grows a new generation of inventers, entrepreneurs, artists, scientists and thinkers who come up with the next great idea for the planet. And that new idea creates new jobs and that creates revenue for the state. But if those who have the most money don't pay their fair share of taxes, the state can't function. The schools can't produce the best and the brightest who will go on to create those jobs. If the wealthy get to keep most of their money, we have seen what they will do with it: recklessly gamble it on crazy Wall Street schemes and crash our economy. The crash they created cost us millions of jobs.  That too caused a reduction in revenue. And the population ended up suffering because they reduced their taxes, reduced our jobs and took wealth out of the system, removing it from circulation.

The nation is not broke, my friends. Wisconsin is not broke. It's part of the Big Lie. It's one of the three biggest lies of the decade: America/Wisconsin is broke, Iraq has WMD, the Packers can't win the Super Bowl without Brett Favre.

The truth is, there's lots of money to go around. LOTS. It's just that those in charge have diverted that wealth into a deep well that sits on their well-guarded estates. They know they have committed crimes to make this happen and they know that someday you may want to see some of that money that used to be yours. So they have bought and paid for hundreds of politicians across the country to do their bidding for them. But just in case that doesn't work, they've got their gated communities, and the luxury jet is always fully fueled, the engines running, waiting for that day they hope never comes. To help prevent that day when the people demand their country back, the wealthy have done two very smart things:
1. They control the message. By owning most of the media they have expertly convinced many Americans of few means to buy their version of the American Dream and to vote for their politicians. Their version of the Dream says that you, too, might be rich some day – this is America, where anything can happen if you just apply yourself! They have conveniently provided you with believable examples to show you how a poor boy can become a rich man, how the child of a single mother in Hawaii can become president, how a guy with a high school education can become a successful filmmaker. They will play these stories for you over and over again all day long so that the last thing you will want to do is upset the apple cart -- because you -- yes, you, too! -- might be rich/president/an Oscar-winner some day! The message is clear: keep you head down, your nose to the grindstone, don't rock the boat and be sure to vote for the party that protects the rich man that you might be some day.

2. They have created a poison pill that they know you will never want to take. It is their version of mutually assured destruction. And when they threatened to release this weapon of mass economic annihilation in September of 2008, we blinked. As the economy and the stock market went into a tailspin, and the banks were caught conducting a worldwide Ponzi scheme, Wall Street issued this threat: Either hand over trillions of dollars from the American taxpayers or we will crash this economy straight into the ground. Fork it over or it's Goodbye savings accounts. Goodbye pensions. Goodbye United States Treasury. Goodbye jobs and homes and future. It was friggin' awesome and it scared the shit out of everyone. "Here! Take our money! We don't care. We'll even print more for you! Just take it! But, please, leave our lives alone, PLEASE!"

The executives in the board rooms and hedge funds could not contain their laughter, their glee, and within three months they were writing each other huge bonus checks and marveling at how perfectly they had played a nation full of suckers. Millions lost their jobs anyway, and millions lost their homes. But there was no revolt (see #1).

Until now. On Wisconsin! Never has a Michigander been more happy to share a big, great lake with you! You have aroused the sleeping giant know as the working people of the United States of America. Right now the earth is shaking and the ground is shifting under the feet of those who are in charge. Your message has inspired people in all 50 states and that message is: WE HAVE HAD IT! We reject anyone tells us America is broke and broken. It's just the opposite! We are rich with talent and ideas and hard work and, yes, love. Love and compassion toward those who have, through no fault of their own, ended up as the least among us. But they still crave what we all crave: Our country back! Our democracy back! Our good name back! The United States of America. NOT the Corporate States of America. The United States of America!

So how do we get this? Well, we do it with a little bit of Egypt here, a little bit of Madison there. And let us pause for a moment and remember that it was a poor man with a fruit stand in Tunisia who gave his life so that the world might focus its attention on how a government run by billionaires for billionaires is an affront to freedom and morality and humanity.

Thank you, Wisconsin. You have made people realize this was our last best chance to grab the final thread of what was left of who we are as Americans. For three weeks you have stood in the cold, slept on the floor, skipped out of town to Illinois -- whatever it took, you have done it, and one thing is for certain: Madison is only the beginning. The smug rich have overplayed their hand. They couldn't have just been content with the money they raided from the treasury. They couldn't be satiated by simply removing millions of jobs and shipping them overseas to exploit the poor elsewhere. No, they had to have more – something more than all the riches in the world. They had to have our soul. They had to strip us of our dignity. They had to shut us up and shut us down so that we could not even sit at a table with them and bargain about simple things like classroom size or bulletproof vests for everyone on the police force or letting a pilot just get a few extra hours sleep so he or she can do their job -- their $19,000 a year job. That's how much some rookie pilots on commuter airlines make, maybe even the rookie pilots flying people here to Madison. But he's stopped trying to get better pay. All he asks is that he doesn't have to sleep in his car between shifts at O'Hare airport. That's how despicably low we have sunk. The wealthy couldn't be content with just paying this man $19,000 a year. They wanted to take away his sleep. They wanted to demean and dehumanize him. After all, he's just another slob.

And that, my friends, is Corporate America's fatal mistake. But trying to destroy us they have given birth to a movement -- a movement that is becoming a massive, nonviolent revolt across the country. We all knew there had to be a breaking point some day, and that point is upon us. Many people in the media don't understand this. They say they were caught off guard about Egypt, never saw it coming. Now they act surprised and flummoxed about why so many hundreds of thousands have come to Madison over the last three weeks during brutal winter weather. "Why are they all standing out there in the cold? I mean there was that election in November and that was supposed to be that!

"There's something happening here, and you don't know what it is, do you ...?"

America ain't broke! The only thing that's broke is the moral compass of the rulers. And we aim to fix that compass and steer the ship ourselves from now on. Never forget, as long as that Constitution of ours still stands, it's one person, one vote, and it's the thing the rich hate most about America -- because even though they seem to hold all the money and all the cards, they begrudgingly know this one unshakeable basic fact: There are more of us than there are of them!

Madison, do not retreat.  We are with you. We will win together.


Wisconsin Gov. Walker Threatens 1500 Layoffs if Senate Democrats Don't Return

Friday, March 4, 2011 by The Canadian Press
by Scott Bauer

MADISON, Wis. — Thousands of Wisconsin state workers were bracing for layoff notices Friday as the Republican governor and absent Democratic lawmakers remained in a standoff over a budget balancing bill that would also strip public workers of their collective bargaining rights.

Gov. Scott Walker said he would issue 1,500 layoff notices Friday if at least one of the 14 Senate Democrats doesn't return from Illinois to give the Republican majority the quorum it needs to vote. Senate Republicans voted Thursday to hold the missing Democrats in contempt and force police to bring them back to the Capitol.

Walker wants to decrease funding to school districts and local governments to ease a budget deficit. He says taking away public employees' collective bargaining rights is necessary because schools and local governments would have a tough time making cuts if they have to negotiate with unions.

The statewide teachers union and state workers unions have said they would agree to Walker's proposed benefit concessions — which would amount to an 8 per cent pay cut — as long as they retain collective bargaining rights.

Labour leaders say the measure is really meant to weaken the power of unions, which count many government employees among their ranks and provide a key voter base for Democrats.

Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald cancelled Friday's floor session, saying in a statement that Republican senators want time to allow law enforcement to adjust their staffing levels and "help the Capitol to return to something of a sense of normalcy."

The budget balancing legislation has led to nearly three weeks of protests — some attended by tens of thousands of union supporters — in and around the state capitol, which was completely cleared of demonstrators late Thursday for the first time in 17 nights after a judge ordered the building closed during non-business hours.

The protesters' dramatic departure capped a day full of developments, including Walker's threat of massive layoffs he said would be needed to make up for savings not being realized in the stalled bill.

With the labour bill stalled, Walker said he has to issue layoff notices starting Friday so the state can start to realize the $30 million savings he had assumed would come from the concessions. The layoffs wouldn't be effective for 31 days, and Walker said he could rescind them if the bill passed in the meantime.

Democratic Senate Minority Leader Mark Miller confirmed there were talks with Walker, but he did not think they were close to reaching a deal.

Why Employee Pensions Are NOT Bankrupting States

Sunday, March 6, 2011 by the McClatchy Newspapers
by Kevin G. Hall

WASHINGTON — From state legislatures to Congress to tea party rallies, a vocal backlash is rising against what are perceived as too-generous retirement benefits for state and local government workers. However, that widespread perception doesn't match reality.

A close look at state and local pension plans across the nation, and a comparison of them to those in the private sector, reveals a more complicated story. However, the short answer is that there's simply no evidence that state pensions are the current burden to public finances that their critics claim.

Pension contributions from state and local employers aren't blowing up budgets. They amount to just 2.9 percent of state spending, on average, according to the National Association of State Retirement Administrators. The Center for Retirement Research at Boston College puts the figure a bit higher at 3.8 percent.

Though there's no direct comparison, state and local pension contributions approximate the burden shouldered by private companies. The nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute estimates that retirement funding for private employers amounts to about 3.5 percent of employee compensation.

Nor are state and local government pension funds broke. They're underfunded, in large measure because — like the investments held in 401(k) plans by American private-sector employees — they sunk along with the entire stock market during the Great Recession of 2007-2009. And like 401(k) plans, the investments made by public-sector pension plans are increasingly on firmer footing as the rising tide on Wall Street lifts all boats.

Boston College researchers project that if the assets in state and local pension plans were frozen tomorrow and there was no more growth in investment returns, there'd still be enough money in most state plans to pay benefits for years to come.

"On average, with the assets on hand today, plans are able to pay annual benefits at their current level for another 13 years. This assumes, pessimistically, that plans make no future pension contributions and there is no growth in assets," said Jean-Pierre Aubry, a researcher specializing in state and local pensions for the nonpartisan Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

In 2006, when the economy was humming before the financial crisis began, the value of assets in state and local pension funds covered promised benefits for a period of just over 19 years.

At the bottom of Aubry's list is Kentucky, which would have enough assets to cover 4.7 years. Other states do much better: North Carolina local government pensions are funded to cover 19 years of promised benefits; Florida's state plan could cover 17 years; and California's plans about 15 years.

"On the whole, the pension system isn't bankrupting every state in the country," Aubry said.

States having the biggest problems with pension obligations tend to be struggling with overall fiscal woes — New Jersey and Illinois in particular. Many states are now wrestling with underfunding because they didn't contribute enough during boom years.

Most state and local employees government across the nation have defined-benefit plans that promise employees either a percentage of their final salary during retirement or some fixed amount. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that 91 percent of full-time state and local government workers have access to defined-benefit plans.

Several states -- including Florida, Georgia, Ohio, Colorado and Washington -- have adopted competing defined-contribution plans, or a hybrid plan that provides government employees both a partial defined benefit in retirement and a supplementary defined-contribution plan.

Defined-contribution 401(k) plans divert on a tax-deferred basis a portion of pay, generally partially matched by the employer, into an account that invests in stocks and bonds. In 1980, 84 percent of workers at medium and large companies in the U.S. had a defined-benefit plan like those still predominate in the public sector. By last year, just 30 percent of workers in these larger companies were covered under such plans.

Defenders of the public pension system say anti-government, anti-union elected officials and interest groups have exaggerated the problem to score political points, and that as the economy heals, public pension plans will gain value and prove critics wrong.

"There's a window that's closing as market conditions improve and interest rates rise, the funding of these plans is going to look better than depicted by some," insisted Keith Brainard, the director of research for the National Association of State Retirement Administrators in Georgetown, Texas.

Critics of public sector pensions paint the problem with a broad brush.

"Unionized government workers have tremendous leverage to negotiate their own wages and benefits. They funnel tens of millions of dollars to elect candidates who will sit across from them at the negotiating table," said Thomas Donohue, the chief executive of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in a Feb. 24 blog post. "This self-dealing has resulted in ever-increasing wage and benefit packages for unionized government workers that often far outstrip those for comparable private-sector workers."

In a Feb. 23 radio interview, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., called federal stimulus efforts to rescue the economy "essentially a federal bailout of public employee unions." Nunes described money owed to state pensioners as a crisis "about ready to happen."

Except that two out of every three public-sector workers aren't union members.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in January that 31.1 percent of state public-sector workers were unionized in 2010, compared with 26.8 percent of federal government employees. The highest percentage of unionization, 43.3 percent, was found in local government, where police officers and firefighters work. Teachers can fall into either state systems or local government.

Ironically, in Wisconsin, where Republican Gov. Scott Walker is trying to weaken public-sector unions and reduce pension benefits, he's exempted police and firefighters, who are among the most unionized public employees. And Wisconsin's public-sector pension plan still has enough assets today to cover more than 18 years of benefits.

The most recent Public Fund Survey by the National Association of State Retirement Administrators showed that, on average, state and local pensions were 78.9 percent funded, with about $688 billion in unfunded promises to pensioners. Critics suggest that the real number is at least $1 trillion or higher, using less-optimistic market assumptions.

The unfunded liabilities would be a problem if all state and local retirees went into retirement at once, but they won't. Nor will state governments go out of business and hand underfunded pension plans over to a federal regulator, as happens in the private sector. State and local governments are ongoing enterprises.

The flow of employees into retirement matches up with population trends in states, with Northeastern states with declining populations, particularly Rhode Island, seeing more stress on their pension systems than Southern and Western states, where there's been vibrant population growth.

Another misperception tied to the pension debate is that while the private sector has shed jobs during the economic crisis, state and local government employment has grown — and pensions along with it.

Since September 2008_ when state and local government employees numbered 19,385,000 and the economic crisis turned severe — the governments' payrolls shrunk by 407,000, to 18,978,000 this January, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

When calculating from December 2007_ the month that the National Bureau of Economic Research determined was the start of the Great Recession_ state and local government employment has fallen by 703,000 jobs amid a downturn that cost the nation more than 8 million jobs overall.

"The down economy has had an effect, and the loss of employment outside the public sector has created a contrast" said Brainard, of the National Association of State Retirement Administrators.

Also fueling backlash is the perception that state and local workers don't contribute to their own retirement funds the way private sector workers do.

Four states have non-contribution public pension plans_ Florida, Utah, Oregon and Connecticut. Missouri until recently had a non-contribution policy for state workers, as did Michigan until 1997. Michigan workers hired before 1997 still don't pay toward their pensions, and some teachers in Arkansas don't have to contribute toward theirs. Tennessee doesn't require contributions from most workers and employees in the state higher education system.

Those notable exceptions aside, most states require employee contributions. The midpoint for these contributions for all states and the District of Columbia is 5 percent of pay, according to academic and state-level research. That contribution rate climbs to 8 percent for the handful of states whose workers or teachers are prohibited from paying into the federal Social Security program.

By comparison, private-sector workers shoulder a bit more of the burden.

In its data for 2010, Fidelity Investments, the largest administrator of private-sector 401(k) retirement plans, showed employee contribution rates in its plans averaged 8.2 percent of pre-tax pay.

Separately, the Employee Benefits Research Institution estimates that most private-sector employers match up to 50 percent of employee contributions up to the first 6 percent of salary.

The utility or burden of either type of retirement plan depends on whether the plan is measured by what it delivers to an individual, or by how much it delivers to all workers receiving retirement benefits from their employer.

"It really comes down to what you are attempting to do," said Dallas Salisbury, the president of the nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute.

Viewed through the lens of an employee, defined-benefit plans are more cost-effective at providing a pre-determined level of benefits to an employee. But the shortcoming of these plans is that they reward seniority. For workers with a shorter tenure, they're far less generous in retirement.

This fairness issue is one reason why 401(k) plans have grown steadily in prominence since the mid-1980s. From the payroll perspective of an employer, these defined-contribution plans produce at least some retirement income for the greatest number of employees, and the plans can move with employees who change jobs.

Main Street Goes to War Against Itself as Job Crisis Persists

Friday, March 4, 2011 by Huffington Post
by Les Leopold

The February unemployment rate is 8.9 percent. The broader Bureau of Labor Statistics U6 jobless rate is 15.9 percent. The report shows a net increase of 192,000 jobs. However, we need 127,000 new jobs every month to keep up with population growth. At this rate it will take 11.2 years to get back to full employment.

A Wall Street billionaire, a unionized public employee, and a Tea Party member are sitting at a table eying a plate of a dozen delicious cookies. The financier reaches across and takes 11 cookies, looks at the tea partier and says, "Watch out for that union guy. He wants your cookie."

How did this happen? How did we get to the point where governors all over the place are blaming the economic crisis on working people?

We're here because we didn't take the fight to Wall Street. The White House, Congress, and even trade unions let Wall Street off the hook. And now working people and the middle class all over the country are paying a heavy price.

The battle actually started thirty years ago when our nation embarked on a real-time experiment: Would wholesale financial deregulation and tax cuts for the super-rich drive a massive investment boom that would make all boats rise? It turned out, no. Instead, working families' incomes stalled. But the wealthy were left with such thick wads of cash that they didn't know where to spend it all. So they bought up Wall Street's new toxic "financial innovations." And presto: the largest financial crash since the Great Depression. (My apologies for the self-promotion but please see The Looting of America for an accessible account of the meltdown.)

Remember a couple years back, when Wall Street was on its knees, begging for our support? That was the perfect moment to reverse the 30-year trend and create a new kind of financial system that wouldn't gamble away our nation's wealth. Instead we resurrected too-big-to fail institutions and bailed out virtually every Wall Street investor.

And now, the right wing, which has been banging its drum against unions, government, and taxes for years, is having a field day using our recession-induced budget problems as a cover for slicing their enemies -- the unions -- to smithereens.

There's plenty of blame to pass around.
,
The White House:

President Obama started out with populist rhetoric that reflected America's disgust with Wall Street's greed. But soon, he tucked behind his Wall Street-friendly corps of advisors -- Geithner, Summers and Bernanke -- who told him there was only one way to avert another Great Depression and start generating jobs: Resurrect Wall Street with trillions of dollars in loans, asset swaps and guarantees -- and throw in a modest stimulus program.

So Obama stopped talking about shrinking Wall Street's profits and wages. He stopped talking about how our best and brightest should forgo Wall Street and instead build productive careers in education, science and medicine. He stopped talking about how appalling it was to be bailing out the very people who'd brought the economy to its knees. What could he say, given how much the administration had done for the Wall Street billionaires? Now it's hard even to remember that our cocky financiers were so recently on their knees begging for survival.

It turned out that Geithner, Summers and Bernanke were only half right: The US did avert (or postpone) a Great Depression -- but jobs did not follow. Thanks to the US taxpayer, Wall Street's profits and bonuses went back to record levels, as if nothing much had happened. People stopped talking about financial nationalization and "hair cuts" for investors.

Obama squandered the progressive moment. Because had had refused to make Wall Street pay for the damage it had caused, we had no way to fund serious job creation. As a consequence, the "nationalization" we saw was of deep, persistent unemployment in every corner of the country. And the people getting the hair cut were the Democrats. They were pummeled in the mid-terms not because of health care reform, but because the traditional "Party of Jobs" failed to create them. In my opinion, they were punished for being the Party of Wall Street.

After the massive electoral defeat, the President turned into a deficit hawk, pushing the entire debate to the right. When he called for freezing public employees' wages, he fired the first shot in the war against workers on Main Street.

Congress:

Of course the President had many fainthearted enablers on Capitol Hill. Congress failed miserably to build on Main Street's anger against Wall Street. Lawmakers couldn't even bring themselves to close a simple loophole to force the richest hedge fund financiers -- people making $2.4 million an HOUR -- to pay normal income taxes. Instead these hedge honchos still only pay 15 percent -- a lower rate than their own office cleaners. Closing that loophole on the top 25 hedge fund managers alone would have reduced the deficit twice as much as Obama's two-year wage freeze on federal employees.

Congress members also couldn't bear to break up too-big-to-fail institutions. They couldn't stomach windfall profits taxes or transaction taxes on the financial sector to help pay for our continuing bailout. (Who do you think now owns and guarantees hundreds of billions in toxic assets? You do!) And of course, the Capitol Hill crew didn't have the nerve to put Americans back to work through visionary moves like free higher education or the nationwide weatherization of all our homes and businesses.

The Labor Movement

Unfortunately, most trade unions also missed the moment. They were so invested in Obama and the Democrats that they didn't want (and maybe forgot how) to mobilize en masse against Wall Street. Americans needed a clear narrative explaining how Wall Street caused the financial crisis and a coherent program to create millions of sustainable jobs. They got neither from organized labor.

To be fair, labor had its hands full. With union jobs rapidly evaporating, it had bet the farm that a Democratic administration and Democratic Congress would pass the Employee Free Choice Act. (EFCA aims to level the playing field so that workers who want unions can form them without being fired.) This reform, they hoped, would unleash a great new surge of union organizing. But the bill didn't even come up for a vote. Now, in state after state -- even in old union strongholds like Wisconsin, Iowa and Michigan -- politicians are hacking at workers' basic collective bargaining rights, as if somehow those workers caused the financial crisis. As one savvy union staffer quipped, "Workers don't make synthetic CDOs!"

So let's square up. Where we are, and how did we get to this fateful moment?
1. Because we bailed out Wall Street banks and then let them off the hook, they're now back to collecting record profits. Hedge fund managers are making billions for themselves thanks to our blanket bailout of the financial sector. Not only are they not paying reparations, they're fighting hard to roll back even more regulations so they can run their financial casinos with full impunity. Their contribution to deficit reduction is minuscule. Equality of sacrifice is a joke on Wall Street.

2. Because of the financial crisis set off by Wall Street and Wall Street alone, 8.75 million jobs were lost in one year. With economic growth still feeble and corporations hoarding their money, it will take over 11.2 years to reach full-employment again at the rate we're going.

3. Because of high unemployment and the resulting drop in tax revenues (as well as years of tax cuts for the wealthy and large corporations), state and local government budgets are having a fiscal heart attack. It's open season on public employees, the last bunch of American workers who are a) unionized in large numbers, b) still have decent health care benefits and c) still have defined benefit pension plans (which don't force workers to shoulder all the financial risks in retirement). Meanwhile, no one's going after the ultra-rich for shirking their state and local taxes. In every state of the union, the richest one percent of residents pay a lower percentage of their income in total state and local taxes than do middle- or low-income residents.)

4. Political demagogues are playing working people against each other with the rhetorical cry, "Why should taxpayers pay for public employee benefits that they themselves can only dream of?" The obvious answer is that private sector workers should also have decent health care benefits and pensions. Meanwhile, a windfall profits tax on Wall Street could close every state budget gap in the country.

Thank goodness for the intrepid workers and students in Wisconsin, Indiana, and elsewhere who are resisting the assault. And thank goodness most Americans are on their side, according to a recent New York Times/CBS News poll. It showed that a majority support public sector collective bargaining, favor tax increases over cuts in public sector benefits, and don't think unions are too influential.)

The bagpiping firefighters camped out at the Wisconsin capitol are blocking the maniacal march to lower our standard of living. But that's not good enough. It's time for the bagpipes to march on Wall Street... and for the rest of us to join them.

Leaked EPA Documents Expose Decades-Old Effort To Hide Dangers of Natural Gas Extraction

Cover-up...
Friday, March 4, 2011 by Democracy Now!


Efforts by lawmakers and regulators to force the federal government to better police the natural gas drilling process known as hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking" have been thwarted for the past 25 years, according to an expose in the New York Times. Studies by scientists at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on fracking have been repeatedly narrowed in scope by superiors and important findings have been removed under pressure from the industry. The news comes as the EPA is conducting a broad study of the risks of natural gas drilling with preliminary results scheduled to be delivered next year. Joining us is Walter Hang, president of Toxics Targeting, a firm that tracks environmental spills and releases across the country based in Ithaca, New York, where fracking is currently taking place.

Realstreaming video

Real Audio Stream

MP3 Download

Celebrity Supporters of Obama Campaign Feel Betrayed by the President

Sunday, March 6, 2011 by The Independent/UK
Matt Damon (& others) Takes Aim at Obama
"The President has rolled over to Wall Street completely," the star tells The Independent/UK

Few of Barack Obama's celebrity supporters at the 2008 US presidential election were as committed to his cause as the Oscar-winning actor Matt Damon. Rather than merely support Mr Obama in an online video, Damon, one of Hollywood's highest-profile liberal activists, campaigned for the Democratic nominee in Florida. Not content with that, he provided one of the most cutting insults of the campaign when he described the Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin as "really terrifying... like something out of a bad Disney movie".

Damon, 40, star of the Bourne spy trilogy and two new films, The Adjustment Bureau and True Grit, is scrupulously polite and mild-mannered when we meet in a Manhattan hotel. But laying bare his disenchantment with the Obama administration, he doesn't hide how let down he feels. President Obama's record on the economy particularly rankles. "I think he's rolled over to Wall Street completely. The economy has huge problems. We still have all these banks that are too big to fail. They're bigger and making more money than ever. Unemployment at 10 per cent? It's terrible."

What has proved to be a challenging time in office for President Obama culminated in significant Democratic reversals to the Republicans at last November's mid-term elections. Many of his star backers have either kept quiet about politics or, as in the case of George Clooney, Damon's close friend and co-star in the Ocean's trilogy, remained steadfastly loyal. Not Damon. He is upset that Mr Obama, who promised to "spread the wealth around", has extended the Bush tax cuts and that the inequality gap has widened.

"They had a chance that they don't have any more to stand up for things," he says. "They've probably squandered that at this point. They'll probably just make whatever deals they can to try to get elected again."

Damon appears so disillusioned that, playing devil's advocate, I ask whether he is considering voting Republican. "Good God, no! I just got a 3 per cent tax cut. Do you think I'm going to start a small business with that money? You're out of your mind if you think so. I'm going to put it in the bank. So is every other guy that makes the kind of money I make. I don't think that's what's best for the country. I think a stronger middle class makes for a stronger country."

As well as the economy, Mr Obama's record on education repels him. "They have to get people who actually know about educating kids in positions of power. Now they're trying to get business people to come and manage schools like they're factories. It's not going to work."

Damon says that he's excited to be playing a politician for the first time in The Adjustment Bureau, a sci-fi romance. But he has no intention of seeking office. "There's probably a problem with somebody who wants to be a politician in the first place."

That said, he does admire Bill Clinton. Damon based his portrayal of LaBoeuf, the loquacious ranger in True Grit, on the former president. "There's a little bit of Clinton's charm thrown in. I could listen to him talk forever."

A 2007 Forbes magazine study, linking actors' salaries to box office revenue, found Damon to be Hollywood's most profitable actor, but the most extraordinary thing about him in person is how ordinary he is. He brushes aside an attempt by a publicist to serve him coffee, insisting on pouring it himself. Instead of a celebrity actress or model spouse, he is married to Luciana Barroso whom he met while she was bartending in Miami. They live in New York with their four children.

How some big names turned against the President

"How is Obama's approach to Sudan an evolution of justice? And when the administration says it intends to work to 'improve the lives of the people of Darfur', I would like to know what that means, besides the point that their lives could hardly get worse."

Angelina Jolie
Actress
December 2009

"While I am confident that Obama never intended to offend anyone [with a joke about the Special Olympics], the response his comments have caused... demonstrates the need to continue to educate the non-disabled community."

Maria Shriver
Journalist
March 2009


"Before this [Gulf of Mexico] catastrophe, our President was in favour of offshore drilling. And when this thing happened, he backtracked real quick."

Spike Lee
Film director
August 2010

Democrats Are Ceding the Entire Traditional Democratic Economic Ideology


by Laurence Lewis

 
On Thursday, we got this news:
President Obama on Wednesday intervened in a partisan brawl that threatens to shut down the government, inviting congressional leaders of both parties to sit down with Vice President Biden and work out a compromise to fund federal programs through the end of the fiscal year.
The official statement called for a "bipartisan" approach. There seems to be a presumption that no one has been paying attention the past couple years, because the only people that still believe in bipartisanship are also likely the holdouts on Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. The way it actually works is that every time the word is mentioned, Democrats give ground on core principles while Republicans have to accept that they get only some, but not all, of what they want. The administration's framing of its role also is interesting. Republican administrations tend to think of themselves as partisan, representing the core values of their party. This administration seems to think of itself as a mediator between partisans. Triangulation you can believe in.

Back in December, at the press conference after he cut the bipartisan deal with Republicans to make the disastrously irresponsible Bush tax cuts his own, President Obama gave this stunning response:
Look, here's my expectation -- and I'll take John Boehner at his word -- that nobody, Democrat or Republican, is willing to see the full faith and credit of the United States government collapse, that that would not be a good thing to happen. And so I think that there will be significant discussions about the debt limit vote. That's something that nobody ever likes to vote on. But once John Boehner is sworn in as Speaker, then he's going to have responsibilities to govern. You can't just stand on the sidelines and be a bomb thrower. And so my expectation is, is that we will have tough negotiations around the budget, but that ultimately we can arrive at a position that is keeping the government open, keeping Social Security checks going out, keeping veterans services being provided, but at the same time is prudent when it comes to taxpayer dollars.
At the same press conference, he described the Republicans as having held the middle-class tax cuts hostage to the upper-income tax cuts. But he somehow took the head hostage-taker at his word not to use a government shutdown as a further threat—the ransom being radical budget cuts during a tentative recovery from a deep recession. Which we all knew was high on the Republican agenda, which we all knew would be high on their agenda once they took control of the House, and which they now knew they had the means of getting: take the functioning government itself hostage, and threaten to shut it down when the spending cap comes due. It wasn't difficult to predict.
Look, here's my expectation -- and I'll take John Boehner at his word -- that nobody, Democrat or Republican, is willing to see the full faith and credit of the United States government collapse, that that would not be a good thing to happen.
Irresponsibility from the Republicans should be expected. Rapacious greed from the Republicans should be expected. Class warfare from the Republicans should be expected. So should lies. These are the people who took us into two staggeringly expensive wars without any mechanism to pay for them, indeed with concurrent policies that undermined the mechanism to pay for them. These are the people who long have been waging war against unions and working people, presumably because if only they and their patrons can treat American workers the way they treat their workers in overseas sweatshops, they won't have to outsource all their labor.

These are the people questioning the president's citizenship, who claimed his health care plans included forced euthanasia, who claim Social Security will be insolvent, who tie it to the federal deficit, and who scream "Socialism!" and "Sharia Law!"
Look, here's my expectation -- and I'll take John Boehner at his word -- that nobody, Democrat or Republican, is willing to see the full faith and credit of the United States government collapse, that that would not be a good thing to happen.
Taking at his word a man whose very skin tone cannot be found in nature. It took Boehner just over two months to threaten that government shutdown. And while his colleagues negotiated a bipartisan stop-gap that will keep the government open while cutting the budget on a pro-rated basis pretty much as they wanted, Boehner himself had more important things on his agenda.
Look, here's my expectation -- and I'll take John Boehner at his word -- that nobody, Democrat or Republican, is willing to see the full faith and credit of the United States government collapse, that that would not be a good thing to happen.
The problem is that, on economic issues, DC Democrats have forgotten how to be Democrats. By making the Bush tax cuts their own, they have removed even from discussion the most obvious means of addressing any fiscal issues. And it isn't confined to the White House.

Congressional Democrats are playing along by accepting those short-term budget cuts for a mere delay in the shutdown showdown, signaling as the White House already did with the tax cuts that the Republicans can get their way by playing hardball. But is it really only the Republicans' way? That's the question. And while some Democratic governors are attempting a more responsible approach, their efforts are being hampered by those Obama tax cuts:
Struggling states could lose as much as $5.3 billion in tax collections during the next few years in an unintended consequence of one of the lower-profile federal tax cuts that President Obama enacted in December, according to a report released Tuesday. The tax-cut package the president signed in December is best known for extending the Bush-era tax rates for two years and giving a one-year payroll tax cut to most Americans. But it included a business tax cut that could blow a hole in state budgets: a provision allowing businesses to deduct the full value of new equipment purchases from their taxes through 2011.
Those Democratic governors deserve a lot of credit, because the politics of supporting responsible tax increases is not easy when a Democratic White House and its Congressional allies have removed tax increases from the federal conversation and are actually doing the exact opposite by promoting tax cuts at the same time they're ostensibly concerned about deficits. Tax cuts that are making the jobs of those Democratic governors even more difficult.

The post-war economic boom included vastly higher marginal tax rates than we have now. President Clinton increased taxes, erased the record Reagan-George H.W. Bush deficits, and enjoyed an economic spike that saw near full employment. Bush cut taxes and oversaw the disintegration of the Clinton surplus, the creation of the largest-ever federal deficits and an economic meltdown. The greatest economic mistake made by President Franklin Roosevelt was when he overestimated the recovery that had been sparked by the New Deal, and cut government spending in 1937, sending the economy into another downward spiral. This isn't complicated. The evidence is clear. This was part of the core of the Democratic Party's economic ideology. But with the economy in early 2011 still struggling to recover from the Friedman/Reagan/Bush economic disaster, and with unemployment and under-employment still devastating the lives of a sixth of the populace, which model is the White House and Congressional Democrats following?

Whatever the budget resolution ends up being, you can be certain that it will be sold as a compromise. But it won't be a compromise. As it so often does, the administration ceded the paradigm from the start. A real compromise would include what now isn't even being discussed. A real compromise would begin by asking what the American people need, and how we are going to pay for it. Instead, the only debate will be about the depth and specifics of the inevitable cuts. And we likely will hear much about shared sacrifice from people who themselves will be sacrificing nothing. The Democrats are now playing on the Republicans' field. They are compromising between what had been a Republican economic model and an even worse Republican economic model.

It's bad enough that on economic matters the Democrats won't stand up for the values and models that once defined the party and by which this nation thrived for more than half a century, but they're now actually doing the Republicans' work for them. This enables the Republicans to continue moving even more to the extreme right, with the once fringe Koch model of anarcho-libertarianism now going maintream. The Democrats still control the White House and the Senate, but they have abdicated economic leadership and ceded not just a few issues but what had been their economic ideology. Keynesianism is, at best, dormant. For all the good the Democrats are doing for it, it may as well be dead. Austerity is now the norm. For the Democrats. As the economy continues to stagger, tens of millions of well-meaning Americans continue to suffer, and neither help nor an end is in sight. Grover Norquist must be pleased.

Democrats are starving the government of funding, and Democrats are trending toward cutting it down to the size where it can be drowned in a bathtub.

March 11, 2011--"Day of Rage" with Global Implications

The Day of Rage (Iraq)-- 

The second day of “National Rage” in Iraq produced again big demonstrations in all major cities in Iraq. The relevance of these protest movements cannot be underestimated. These protest are nationwide, not sectarian. The Iraqi youth, main instigators of this movement, are challenging the sectarian Iraqi Quisling government and counter American and Iranian plans for the country: no partitioning of Iraq, but electricity, jobs, clean water, free healthcare and education. No to corruption, no to summary executions and death squads. No to state-sponsored terror. These Iraqi demonstrators want a unified Iraq and want the money of their oil being used for public services. I’ve been following the events today with great admiration and hope, hope for change, hope that the Iraqi people can reverse – as one nation – the deadly spiral of ethnic cleansing, sectarianism, despair and the culture of death, imported by the US horsemen of the apocalypse.

 ++++

According to the same people who predicted the housing bubble and resulting financial crisis/recession/depression which is really only just begun, something big is going to happen on March 11--4 days from now.


It will supposedly take place in the Middle East--Iraq? Libya? Egypt?--and the result will be anything from a huge crackdown to rising food and energy prices. Oil is supposed to shoot up to $200/barrel which makes gasoline $5 per gallon or more.


If you are a cautious type person who heeds warnings, you might want to stock up on groceries here in the next couple of days.


My own opinion on this matter is whatever happens will push prices up drastically, doubling the cost of certain items, tripling others, etc. but everything will go up in price.


Ordinarily, I'd say take this with a grain of salt--and you probably should--but the source runs at about 80% correct on his predictions, take that as however you want to take it. I won't say whom because I don't want go through the whole "conspiracy theorist/not conspiracy theorist" jive which invariably follows any kind of warning like this.


However, scanning through the newsfeeds, I noticed that many Egyptians are marching to Sinai, toward the Sinai/Israel border. Why? I have no idea...--jef













FDA Pulls Unapproved Meds - says cold meds could pose danger (2 articles)

Agency pulls Cardec, Rondec, Organidin and Pediahist
BY Kathleen Lucadamo
NY DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER - Wednesday, March 2nd 2011


The feds are pulling hundreds of cough, cold and allergy medicines that have been prescribed for years without government approval.
 
The Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday warned manufacturers of 500 drugs to stop distributing them in the U.S., saying they could be a danger to people.

 
"We have serious concerns about them because we just simply don't know what is in them, whether they work properly or how they are made," said Michael Levy, director of the FDA's Division of New Drugs and Labeling Compliance.

 
Many doctors may be not realize the drugs don't have FDA approval, he said.

 
The drugs are commonly sold at mom-and-pop and chain drug stores and some are even covered by insurance because they were on the market before the FDA's approval system, officials said.

 
They include Cardec, Rondec, Organidin and Pediahist, which is for children as young as one. Manufacturers worldwide were given 90 days to stop making them - or the FDA may seize them.

 
FDA bosses said they are doing outreach to doctors and pharmacists to alert them about unapproved drugs, many which are marketed in academic journals.

 
They advised consumers to ask health care practitioners if any prescription drug is FDA-approved.

 
"I think every doctor has prescribed some of the drugs on this list," said Michael Marcus, an allergist at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn.

 
"I was surprised some of them never went through the approval process; I thought they did."


+++++

List of unapproved drugs: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm245048.htm
+++++ 
The Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday ordered the makers of about 500 unapproved prescription cough-and-cold medicines to get them off the market because they have not been proved safe and effective.
Tribune Washington bureau

advertising
WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Wednesday ordered the makers of about 500 unapproved prescription cough-and-cold medicines to get them off the market because they have not been proved safe and effective.

The drugs have been linked to a few relatively minor problems, such as drowsiness and irritability, but the FDA is concerned that medical problems with them may be significantly underreported.

"We have some specific safety concerns with some of them," said Deborah Autor, head of compliance in FDA's drug office.

Some of the targeted drugs are labeled as suitable for infants and children but contain ingredients covered by a 2008 FDA advisory that warned against use in over-the-counter medications in children younger than 2.

Others the FDA ordered removed from the market are billed as time-release products. Such medications are difficult to manufacture and, if quality controls are inadequate, some may release drugs too slowly, too quickly or not at all, Autor said.

The FDA also moved against unapproved products with possibly dangerous combinations of drugs, such as two antihistamines, which can cause oversedation.

None of the drugs is a household name, though Autor listed Cardec, Lodrane 24D, Organidin and PediaHist as brands consumers may have encountered.

In addition, none of the drugs fills a unique niche. "There are multiple other (approved) products available," Autor said.

Wednesday's announcement does not affect over-the-counter preparations, widely used to treat cough-and-cold symptoms.

A pharmacist who reviewed the FDA's list of unapproved cough and cold drugs said many of them are already off the market. "A lot of these medications have been discontinued," said Sophia DeMonte, speaking on behalf of the American Pharmacists Association.

Together, the drugs contain 27 ingredients and are made by about 100 companies. The companies were served notice of FDA's intent to remove the drugs by an announcement Wednesday in the Federal Register.

Many of the drugs came on the market before a 1962 law that required makers to prove their effectiveness. Doctors may be prescribing the drugs without knowing they've never been approved, officials said.

Companies have 90 days to stop making the drugs and 180 days to halt shipments of them or face seizure or other enforcement action.

The agency has seized millions of dollars' worth of drugs, but federal law does not call for fines for selling unapproved drugs, and criminal prosecutions are rare.

Makers of unapproved drugs can also apply for FDA approval.